- Thread Starter
- Thread starter
- #16
this was not a letter that was thought out. it was an e-mail response. apperntly four people e-mailed him about the appointment of al and he decided to respond to all four of us instead of each of us which is more efficient for him to do. i got the response about an hour after i wrote to him. so i don't think it was prepared. i think he meant it. its like i said any new person wether good or bad could come to this company and people will shoot them down. give the guy a freakin chance. let him do his job before judging him .RowUnderDCA said:I suspect that at least portions of that letter must have been prepared PRIOR to the announcement. That's a lot of carefully crafted verbiage that is sensitive, personally and culturally and maybe even legally. I wonder if he and Mr. Crellin had already talked about the likely response before the announcement. Or maybe Mr. Parker is just that sharp and forthright. If he penned this response off the top of his head, I'm sure he drives his staff crazy.
[post="284313"][/post]