hillary 2016

Status
Not open for further replies.
700UW said:
13307494_10153717535261275_4519991972279475242_n.jpg

12871450_1148128605280192_2989851534930062100_n.jpg
 
 
Dog Wonder said:
Move to a country that doesn't have free elections, if you can find one that will have you.
Hey Dog, I put in my military time. Did you? You don't like what I have to say? Maybe you should be the one to move.
13269259_866950573438122_8688530620976983995_n.png
 
Hildabeast coronation is all over with the damning IG report, no matter what the corrupt Industrial Union AFL-CIO-EIO tool boys are hoping beyond hope.

"No, her self-serving email set-up was not “allowed” under the State Department’s rules. No, she was not “permitted” to use a personal email system exclusively as she did. No, what she did was hardly just a matter of her “personal convenience.” No, there is no evidence that any State Department attorney (other than perhaps Secretary Clinton herself) ever gave “legal approval” to any part of her special email system. No, everything she did was not “fully above board” or in compliance with the “letter and spirit of the rules,” far from it. Yes, she was indeed required by the FRA to maintain all official emails in an official system for proper review, delineation, and retention upon her departure. Yes, her private server equipment was in fact the subject of multiple attempted intrusion attempts (i.e., hacks), including by foreign nations. The list goes on and on. (Note that this does not even include Ms. Clinton’s many serious “misstatements” about her handling of classified or potentially classified information.)"

http://lawnewz.com/politics/hillary-clintons-emails-now-might-finally-take-her-down/

Stated again for the record....Hildabeast is over and done for 2016 ....very soon. Truckload sale on "Progressive Prozac" this fall.
 
Hackman said:
Oh looky, here's one-line Wonder Mutt with more idiocy on demand.

At least attempt to expound something on the subject Wonder Mutt, if that's possible in a one-liner. A paragraph is out of the question for you, as we know.
13310365_10154243436369600_7274677315621150477_n.jpg
 
700UW said:
It's not a law.

It's a trade agreement negotiated by Bush, with Canada,and Mexico, ratified by the Senate, Bush even came back to sign it also.
 
1993

NAFTA signed into law
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is signed into law by President Bill Clinton. Clinton said he hoped the agreement would encourage other nations to work toward a broader world-trade pact.
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/nafta-signed-into-law
 
 
 
The North American Free Trade Agreement between the United States, Mexico and Canada went into effect 20 years ago this week on January 1, 1994. The massive trade pact was signed into law by President Bill Clinton amidst great promise that it would raise wages, create jobs and even improve health and environmental safety standards.
http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/21042-nafta-at-20-lori-wallach-on-us-job-losses-record-income-inequality-mass-displacement-in-mexico
 
 
This month marks the 20th anniversary of when the U.S. Congress, under a strong a push from President Clinton, ratified the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which he signed into law a month later.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vincent-intondi/nafta-immigration_b_4209250.html
 
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top