ThirdSeatHero
Veteran
Yet another example of teamster lies...
This is from the AA organizing site
http://www.teamster.org/content/amfa%E2%80%99s-poor-attempt-distort-truth
The topic is "Blended Work"
And the ibt claim .....
So the ibt claims to be "reducing" the amount of this work .... they are attempting to "finally fix" it in current negotiations....
Here is the problem with all of this..... the ibt claimed to have fixed it already in our LAST ibt AGREEMENT
In the following video you'll listen to David Bourne try and peddle the ibt BS agreement, while we were preparing to vote on our last contract, and at the 6:42 mark you will hear him clearly state ....."AND NO MORE BLENDED WORK EITHER"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngBat1AAjp4
We have our teamster agreement......and we STILL have blended work. And its not just at LAX.
Just another teamster lie.
As for the rest of Fishers little missive ...
Here they freely admit to meeting with the company over aircraft movement. While Fisher never admits to agreeing to the company proposal, the most recent IAM Ramp TA contains the language giving this to the Ramp at UAL.
.......but the ibt is going to let us vote on it.
Is this the kind of disingenuous representation you really want?
This is from the AA organizing site
http://www.teamster.org/content/amfa%E2%80%99s-poor-attempt-distort-truth
The topic is "Blended Work"
... the second point is that the IBT failed to address blended “low-tech” work in Los Angeles. Now let’s look at the facts....
And the ibt claim .....
...To date, the Teamsters have been successful in drastically reducing the amount of work this vendor does and the negotiating committee is attempting to finally fix this AMFA-created situation in the new agreement....
So the ibt claims to be "reducing" the amount of this work .... they are attempting to "finally fix" it in current negotiations....
Here is the problem with all of this..... the ibt claimed to have fixed it already in our LAST ibt AGREEMENT
In the following video you'll listen to David Bourne try and peddle the ibt BS agreement, while we were preparing to vote on our last contract, and at the 6:42 mark you will hear him clearly state ....."AND NO MORE BLENDED WORK EITHER"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngBat1AAjp4
We have our teamster agreement......and we STILL have blended work. And its not just at LAX.
Just another teamster lie.
As for the rest of Fishers little missive ...
...The email further states that Clacy Griswold, Ed Gleason and myself agreed with the company to allow this work to be outsourced. To this point, the company approached IBT leadership and made a proposal along the lines described in the email. There was more to the proposal but the point is that neither Clacy, Ed or I have the authority to make a back room deal like AMFA did with the “low-tech” work. In bargaining with the Teamsters, it’s the rank-and-file voting members of the committee who decide whether to accept or reject an offer such as this...
Here they freely admit to meeting with the company over aircraft movement. While Fisher never admits to agreeing to the company proposal, the most recent IAM Ramp TA contains the language giving this to the Ramp at UAL.
.......but the ibt is going to let us vote on it.
Is this the kind of disingenuous representation you really want?