Nader Rips Up The Kerry Camp

[USAir757]

"Nader called the Democrats "gutless, spineless, clueless and hapless" and said their gamble that people would vote for anyone but Bush was misguided and would make them lose the election."

Full Story from Reuters


Nader had originally said that he would drop out if his presence in the election would help Bush get elected. Guess they should have left him alone. Now they got Michael Moore AND Nader saying Kerry isn't it.

 

[KCFlyer]

"Nader called the Democrats "gutless, spineless, clueless and hapless" and said their gamble that people would vote for anyone but Bush was misguided and would make them lose the election."

Full Story from Reuters
Nader had originally said that he would drop out if his presence in the election would help Bush get elected. Guess they should have left him alone. Now they got Michael Moore AND Nader saying Kerry isn't it.

[post="182852"][/post]​

Nader is on an ego trip. Yep...the democratic party is not much more than "Republican lLite". But as I said before, my yellow labrador would be better than Bush. Sadly, my yellow lab would have to decline the nomination for health reasons.

 

[sentrido]

"Nader called the Democrats "gutless, spineless, clueless and hapless" and said their gamble that people would vote for anyone but Bush was misguided and would make them lose the election."

Full Story from Reuters
Nader had originally said that he would drop out if his presence in the election would help Bush get elected. Guess they should have left him alone. Now they got Michael Moore AND Nader saying Kerry isn't it.

[post="182852"][/post]​

I dont think nader ever said he would drop out.

 

[KCFlyer]

I dont think nader ever said he would drop out.

[post="182865"][/post]​

That's because he never said he'd drop out. He's on an ego trip and will pin the blame on Kerry if he costs Kerry the election. That's what he is already doing.

 

[USAir757]

I dont think nader ever said he would drop out.

I recall him saying that he would rather see Kerry as president than Bush, and if it looked like he was going to take the election away from Kerry, he'd drop out. But I can't find anything to back that up now, so I guess I was wrong...

He's on an ego trip and will pin the blame on Kerry if he costs Kerry the election. That's what he is already doing.

Nader isn't on an ego trip really, he's just fighting for a fundamental right to run for president, and it has continuously been hindered and harassed by the dems because they don't want to see him cause another situation like he did in 2000. Truth is though, he has every right to do it. They're trying to elbow him out of the room and you know it.

 

[KCFlyer]

Nader isn't on an ego trip really, he's just fighting for a fundamental right to run for president, and it has continuously been hindered and harassed by the dems because they don't want to see him cause another situation like he did in 2000. Truth is though, he has every right to do it. They're trying to elbow him out of the room and you know it.

Thnink back....way back...to 1992. Remember when Ross Perot was running? Remember how the "other" side was saying that Clinton only won the race because votes were "wasted" on Perot? Remember in 1996, when Perot ran again, Rush Limbaugh wasn't exactly celebrating Perot's "right" to run. Now...Nader certainly does have a right to run. So do I. But if Nader were serious about reforming the government, his efforts would be better served by starting locally, then moving up gradually. "Starting at the top" usually doesn't work in a national election. Nader knows it, and he really does have an ego, and enjoys the free publicity.

 

[ITRADE]

"Thnink back....way back...to 1992. Remember when Ross Perot was running? Remember how the "other" side was saying that Clinton only won the race because votes were "wasted" on Perot?"

True, but then again the RNC wasn't actively seeking actions in state courts to prevent a candidate from getting on the ballot. Can't say the same of the DNC.

 

[FredF]

KC you are correct. Ross's only reason to run was to keep Bush from being re-elected. All you had to do was sit back, pay attention to what was going on and it was very clear. He droped out of the race, re-entered it and basically took away votes from Bush.

No, the RNC was none too happy about it but then again they did what they could to stop it but they did at least stay out of the courts.

Rush was none too happy about it either, but putting it in context, he mainly was complaining that the only reason Ross was running was to defeat Bush. And you know what, he was correct.



You keep complaining about Rush and I can't help but wonder why. Afterall, he is a talk show host plain and simple. His purpose is to entertain audiences. He is not a news show nor does he purport to be one. He give his opinion of the events of the day, no more no less and I have heard him be very critical of the current President.

I keep wondering why people like you are so quick to try to discount him and I think I may understand why.

He is obvously doing something right because he has a huge audience. He entertains and I think he strikes a nerver in most liberal dems. He tells the truth and exposes the lie that has become liberalism. He tells people that when a politicain talks about "the government investing" it actually means more re-distribution of wealth. He calls a liberal a liberal. He openly says that Kerry has made Ted Kennedy the conservative senator from Mass.

He exposes socialism for what it is, a confiscation and re-distribution of wealth. When Hillary proposed hillary care, he took it apart piece by piece and let the people see it for what it actually was and he is doing the same for Kerry.

 

[KCFlyer]

Fred...

Rush appeals to those who are unable to think for themselves. "Megadittos" comes to mind.

 

[USAir757]

But if Nader were serious about reforming the government, his efforts would be better served by starting locally, then moving up gradually. "Starting at the top" usually doesn't work in a national election. Nader knows it, and he really does have an ego, and enjoys the free publicity.

Nader is in the spotlight quite a bit, given the level of support he expects to get on November 2nd. Sure he enjoys the publicity, but it's not to serve his ego. What ego he has gets deflated every four years at election time when he rakes in all of <5% of the vote, in whatever states he was able to fight his way onto the ballot. His deal is getting certain things addressed and different issues to be discussed and debated during the presidential election. He knows well he won't be elected, but the point is he will not stay quiet whilst the Kerry camp unnecessarily harasses and sues he and his campaign so he'll give up and drop out. They should know by now that is NOT how you get rid of Nader.

 

[FredF]

Fred...

Rush appeals to those who are unable to think for themselves. "Megadittos" comes to mind.

[post="183008"][/post]​

Before you can say that, you must understand the term megadittos. I do not believe that you understand that term.

To your other point, Rush actually tries to get people to think for themselvs.

Same old Dem mantra, attack the person when you cannot discount what they are saying.

 

[NWA/AMT]

You keep complaining about Rush and I can't help but wonder why. Afterall, he is a talk show host plain and simple.

[post="183004"][/post]​

Really? You might want to look at this:

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/sit...xtra.guest.html

 

[FredF]

Really? You might want to look at this:

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/sit...xtra.guest.html

[post="183041"][/post]​

"I made an official announcement to open the program today. I have become, and have been for a while, an official, unpaid advisor to the Bush-Cheney '04 campaign, and we decided to go public with this because there's no problem with it whatsoever. "


I don't know what is funnier, him saying or you posting it here.

"an official, unpaid advisor "

 

[NWA/AMT]

"I made an official announcement to open the program today. I have become, and have been for a while, an official, unpaid advisor to the Bush-Cheney '04 campaign, and we decided to go public with this because there's no problem with it whatsoever. "
I don't know what is funnier, him saying or you posting it here.

"an official, unpaid advisor "

[post="183045"][/post]​

Sounds like more than the 'just a talk show host' you were trying to pretend he is, doesn't it? Wonder what he advises them on.........pharmacuticals maybe?

 

[NWA/AMT]

Before you can say that, you must understand the term megadittos. I do not believe that you understand that term.

[post="183024"][/post]​

"Megadittos" means 'I completely agree with you, Rush, and have nothing original to add".

To your other point, Rush actually tries to get people to think for themselvs.

Quite the opposite, Fred. Rush wants to do their thinking for them and hopes they disregard the support his Excrement In Broadcasting network receives from corporations and other organizations with a vested interest in the message he puts out.

Same old Dem mantra, attack the person when you cannot discount what they are saying.

Fred, coming from you, of all people, that is freaking hilarious!