La Li Lu Le Lo
Veteran
- May 29, 2010
- 7,377
- 2,647
- Thread Starter
- Thread starter
- #16
OldGuy@AA you never answered my questions.OldGuy@AA said:The problem with RTW is that the non paying employee enjoys the same benefits as the dues paying employee and also the union must represent these free loaders. A fair scenario would be that the non dues paying employee is not protected by the union. This was not included in the law because those who wrote it knew it would hurt the unions and the dues paying members. It is one sided. This is like you showing up at Tulsa Country Club and demanding a tee time and getting one in front of a dues paying member of the club. The same people who made this law have memberships to these country clubs and are not going to let you or I play a round without paying the dues. Hypocrites. AA is a closed shop and since we are international this state law does not affect us. If it did the TWU would be even weaker than they are now.
Do you think you have seen any benefit to being in a closed shop?
Do you feel it is right to force an employee to join and pay a failure UNION as a condition of employment?
I am honestly interested in your answer.
As far as the second question you have made clear you feel people that don't pay UNION dues but benefit from the UNION are freeloaders. That is understood. What I am asking specifically is how you justify forcing someone to join a UNION and pay dues as a condition of employment when the UNION has failed to perform their primary function for over a decade.