You got what you voted for

[700IAM]

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15706686/

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06318/738168-147.stm


Here are just two examples of why the democrats lost years ago. Now after making false promises to get back into power and only days after their win they are raising taxes and doing exactly the opposite of what they told voters.

The devil is in charge now so don’t get upset when he wants to eat your children and raise your taxes. They will take your money which will hurt your family because they know better than you the poor uneducated public, after all it’s for your on good. Nothing changes except that buffoons can be snookered over and over and over.

 

[Ch. 12]

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15706686/

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06318/738168-147.stm
Here are just two examples of why the democrats lost years ago. Now after making false promises to get back into power and only days after their win they are raising taxes and doing exactly the opposite of what they told voters.

The devil is in charge now so don’t get upset when he wants to eat your children and raise your taxes. They will take your money which will hurt your family because they know better than you the poor uneducated public, after all it’s for your on good. Nothing changes except that buffoons can be snookered over and over and over.

Yo nitwit. Guess you have no idea how gov't works but elected officials are not in power the day after elections. The fact that tax increases are being proposed and promoted would mean that the party CURRENTLY in power is doing so. God is not a Republican, anyways...too much hatred and corruption in that party to be admired by God. But then again...your version of God is pretty damned twisted, isn't it? Seems you strayed from the teachings of the Bible long ago when you started deeming yourself god-like and damning everyone to Hell.

 

[delldude]

Yo nitwit. God is not a Republican, anyways...too much hatred and corruption in that party to be admired by God.

Sources close to the investigation say Abramoff has provided information on his dealings with and campaign contributions and gifts to "dozens of members of Congress and staff," including what Abramoff has reportedly described as "six to eight seriously corrupt Democratic senators."

 

[Ch. 12]

I'd say that Abramhoff is an independent source, eh? He's Karl Rove with a fat wallet so how does that make his statements gospel?

Irregardless, I have already acknowledged that both parties have corruption. It's just that the Reps have preached morality but then have been the least moral over the past several years. And I'm sure that Dems will be implicated in the Abramhoff scandal. I'll bet you that the score is weighted mighty heavily towards the Reps, though, the party that benefitted the most from his special interests. If the Reps are "winning" the Abramhoff scandal 30 to 1, that doesn't equal a tie which is how you all are trying to spin it. Is the ONE ok? Hell no? Greedy Dems stink as much as greedy Reps. But it's a far stretch to try to hold both sides equally accountable. Perhaps you should look at the real investigation which has shown FAR, FAR more money going to the Reps.

 

[delldude]

Poll: Giuliani, McCain, Obama rank high with voters

NEW HAVEN, Conn. -- Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry ranked last in a poll released Monday that scores the popularity of national leaders.

Hey John...why the long face