What's new

2016 GOP 'TEAM'.........(a lot of hall-of-famers / NOT / on this squad !

Status
Not open for further replies.
700UW said:
 
How cute and typical of the libtardo left to embrace something like this. Basically shows their true "double standard" colors in full 4K HD.
 
Now switch this out on a liberal candidate or even Obama, and they would collectively lose their sh!t for weeks. 
 
iV8oFeA.gif
 
Who "embraced" it?

OTOH, Trump fans applaud him makimg outrageous and patently untrue statements and accusations about everyone and everything, so it seems anything goes in this campaign, huh?

You gonna' censor the artist you don't like?

Burn some books?

Talk about the $150 Billion you ignorantly claim the taxpayers are giving Iran?

How about we talk about the cost of Teump's "plan" (there isn't one... Just more Hot Air...) to have the "Biggest, Baddest Military"?

(Like we don't already... Spend more on "Defense" than the next 20-something countries, all but a coup,e of which are our allies...)

How much extra is that gonna' cost?

Let's see some substance there, Petey...

(Right...)
 
Ifly2 said:
Who "embraced" it?

OTOH, Trump fans applaud him makimg outrageous and patently untrue statements and accusations about everyone and everything, so it seems anything goes in this campaign, huh?

You gonna' censor the artist you don't like?

Burn some books?

Talk about the $150 Billion you ignorantly claim the taxpayers are giving Iran?

How about we talk about the cost of Teump's "plan" (there isn't one... Just more Hot Air...) to have the "Biggest, Baddest Military"?

(Like we don't already... Spend more on "Defense" than the next 20-something countries, all but a coup,e of which are our allies...)

How much extra is that gonna' cost?

Let's see some substance there, Petey...

(Right...)
 
You first, oh lack of self awareness one.....
 
townpete said:
The military landscape is litter'd with progtard's that have served. Or claim that they have "served".

Doesn't elevate them above the rest of the progtard cesspool.
In other words their opinions only matter when they agree with yours.
 
777 fixer said:
In other words their opinions only matter when they agree with yours.
 
Its called critical thinking.
 
Try on a pair.
 
delldude said:
Out of curiosity, what were both of your draft classifications?
Registered with Selective Service while I was in the Navy.
 
townpete said:
Its called critical thinking.
Given your habit of repeating lies you hear on talk radio and Fox News i say you could use a whole lot more of it.
 
eolesen said:
They still are.


Call it manipulation if you want, but if the sample sizes were imbalanced and there weren't as many post-debate polls to offset the pre-debate polling, they were right to trim the older results out.
 
 
Currious.   You said the standards are the same, yet CNN says they did change the standards  ..... who to believe......
 
My question was not if they got changed (they did) but why and how.  There were supposed to be 10 candidates on the podium but now there are 11.  It would appear from the CNN article linked that they did not want  to upset Rand or Christie who migth have been bumped off.  Sounds like somone with unfluence or a stake in the debate wanted Rand and Christie to both be up there even if their numbers did not justify it.
 
http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/01/politics/cnn-debate-rules-september-16/index.html
 
townpete said:
This clown just put the last nail into his coffin of his presidential aspiration.
 
Bernie Sanders to Liberty U.: America Was Founded on ‘Racist Principles’
 
 
The crowd reaction was gold, you could hear a pin drop.
 
 
 
 
The answer: BOTH
 
First off, I suspect many of the folks have no clue what Sanders was refering to as they are probably not taught about some of the relavant issues pertaining to the founding of the country.
 
How do you explain the 3/5th compromise? 
 
Ms Tree said:
 
First off, I suspect many of the folks have no clue what Sanders was refering to as they are probably not taught about some of the relavant issues pertaining to the founding of the country.
 
How do you explain the 3/5th compromise? 
Practicing the art of soft bigotry of low expectations again eh?
 
townpete said:
Practicing the art of soft bigotry of low expectations again eh?
As I expected.  You have no clue about the 3/5th compromise either.  Go look it up if you are currious.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top