What's new

Another Greedy UNION seeks new fair contract. IMAGINE THAT

eolesen said:
I was watching "The Office" the other night, and they were making fun of a paper company in a digital age.

One need look no further than what's happened to the paper mills throughout New England and Wisconsin, or the printing companies like RR Donnelly and Rand McNally. I don't think I've bought a physical book since getting my iPad four years ago. I certainly haven't had a phone book let alone a Yellow Pages in almost ten years.

Bears, some of the post-Panamax will indeed come from Europe, but they are already planning to route from Asia as well.

BNSF will finish double-tracking their transcon line by July (http://www.progressiverailroading.com/mow/article/BNSF-begins-doubletrack-project-in-New-Mexico--41210) but while UP was on target to close the remaining 100 miles or so in California-Arizona & Texas within two years, they deliberately slowed it down about 18 months ago.
 
Well Eric, I'm guessing that you and I would consider whatever ... ' WARREN ' is doing / not doing / gonna' do / with BNSF as far as hauling from the west coast ports is concerned a very good indicater of how concerned he is with the Panamax ship / third canal.
 
Your such an idiot to believe slavery only took place in the south. Hell NH was a major importer of slaves........Bigot!

"SLAVERY in NEW HAMPSHIRE
African slaves were noted in New Hampshire by 1645. They concentrated in the area around Portsmouth. Furthermore, as one of the few colonies that did not impose a tariff on slaves, New Hampshire became a base for slaves to be imported into America then smuggled into other colonies. Every census up to the Revolution showed an increase in black population, though they remained proportionally fewer than in most other New England colonies."

http://slavenorth.com/newhampshire.htm

Besides, what does that have to do with training monkeys to walk a tightrope.....Bigot!
 
Your such an idiot to believe slavery only took place in the south. Hell NH was a major importer of slaves........Bigot!

"SLAVERY in NEW HAMPSHIRE
African slaves were noted in New Hampshire by 1645. They concentrated in the area around Portsmouth. Furthermore, as one of the few colonies that did not impose a tariff on slaves, New Hampshire became a base for slaves to be imported into America then smuggled into other colonies. Every census up to the Revolution showed an increase in black population, though they remained proportionally fewer than in most other New England colonies."

http://slavenorth.com/newhampshire.htm

Besides, what does that have to do with training monkeys to walk a tightrope.....Bigot!
OK I'm going back to my elementary school days back in the damn 60s, which unless someone re-wrote it goes something like this...In the north it was a great expense to own slaves. The growing season was short and winters were cold and rough. So the stereotypical slave would have been a liability rather than asset in the great white cold north.
 
signals said:
OK I'm going back to my elementary school days back in the damn 60s, which unless someone re-wrote it goes something like this...In the north it was a great expense to own slaves. The growing season was short and winters were cold and rough. So the stereotypical slave would have been a liability rather than asset in the great white cold north.
 
Another INTELLIGENT post by you 'signals, and I'm being serious  !!
 
What you posted was FACTUAL Truth,.........but like a load of conservative thinking / media,.................'FACTS' aren't allowed to get into the way of thier PARROTING  !!!!!!!!!!!
 
Extrapolating 'it' out a bit further, the Only difference between SLAVERY, HOLOCAUST 1   and HOLOCAUST 2, was that the Southern slavers would (bottom line) not try to KILL / Wipe out the slaves.
 
(whats that you say  'southwind'...." What other HOLOCAUST" )  ??
 
Well the  F I R S T One by the US (Manifest destiny / Doctrine of discovery) ARMY, who allowed the 99 % mass EXTINCTION of the American Buffalo, while the Calvary attempted to totally eradicate the American Indian.  Followed of course by Hitler.
 
I see post post about New Hampshire being a major importer of slaves, went right over your head....just like everything else. Don't you have a drawbridge button to push or graffiti to paint over?
 
The link was to lynchings. No wonder you were the only one in your class who didn't get a trophy.
 
southwind said:
Your such an idiot
When talking to NewHampshire Black Bears I think that pretty much covers it southwind.
 
No need to count all the ways. 🙂
 
NewHampshire Black Bears said:
 
Another INTELLIGENT post by you 'signals, and I'm being serious  !!
 
What you posted was FACTUAL Truth,.........but like a load of conservative thinking / media,.................'FACTS' aren't allowed to get into the way of thier PARROTING  !!!!!!!!!!!
 
Extrapolating 'it' out a bit further, the Only difference between SLAVERY, HOLOCAUST 1   and HOLOCAUST 2, was that the Southern slavers would (bottom line) not try to KILL / Wipe out the slaves.
 
(whats that you say  'southwind'...." What other HOLOCAUST" )  ??
 
Well the  F I R S T One by the US (Manifest destiny / Doctrine of discovery) ARMY, who allowed the 99 % mass EXTINCTION of the American Buffalo, while the Calvary attempted to totally eradicate the American Indian.  Followed of course by Hitler.
Bears is one of those people that like to attribute all the failings of the human race on the American people....... as long as they are white. He would like you to ignore the fact that these things happened throughout the world by every race throughout (and most likely BEFORE) recorded history.
 
Bears is one of those people that like to attribute all the failings of the human race on the American people....... as long as they are white.
He just can't face the truth. You and Southwind, despite all you say and do, are models for the White Southern Male Master Race.
 
Dog Wonder said:
He just can't face the truth. You and Southwind, despite all you say and do, are models for the White Southern Male Master Race.
If you want to hear someone rant about a master race go listen to Louis Farrakhan.
 
I don't believe in a master race.
 
If you truly believe in god or that all things come from one source that conclusion is illogical.
 
I am troubled by this thread. Unions by their very nature and Federal Law are required to act in their members best interests. (see Duty of Fair Representation). Their leaders are duly elected by the members to accomplish the goals of the organization. Just as shareholders elect the Board of Directors.
 
To outsiders or those with an agenda of course they seem greedy! Why? Because they are, Just like the members of the Board of Directors they seek the best deal for those they represent. Many a company has fired a CEO because of performance of the company stock. Everybody hass a boss no matter the income. The free market is the ultimate boss and a cruel harsh taskmaster.
 
La Li Lu Le Lo said:
If you want to hear someone rant about a master race go listen to Louis Farrakhan.
 
I don't believe in a master race.
 
If you truly believe in god or that all things come from one source that conclusion is illogical.
easy La Li you'll be ruining he and Bears clueless stereotyping
 

Latest posts

Back
Top