What's new

Another Theater SHOOTING. Where is the NRA when you need them ?

Has plenty to do with it, and since all you can do is call names, I know I am right as you cant refute the information, so you attack the poster, so typical Karl Rove behavior from you.
 
it has nothing to with it what it amounts to is the left loves to call out christians and  apparently old white guys. It's the in vogue thing to do on the left but let a muslim shoot up some marines and the liberals a re quiet.you can't be politically correct  and do that
 
10454493_897634513662937_7062376138611919671_n.jpg
 
700UW said:
 
Australia's lead could only be followed by the proposition, adoption, and ratification of a new Constitutional amendment that would annul the Second.
 
All you need is a 2/3rds majority in both houses of Congress to adopt such an amendment and 38 state legislatures to ratify it.  Which is simply not going to happen.
 
Hackman said:
As long as your there, you could quif on the shooter and kill him dead....along with everyone else.
How did you get into a thread about Nuts and Guns?
 
I'm not convinced that CCW is that strong of a factor in determining whether and where mass shootings occur, or that any have been instrumental in stopping an active shooter.
 
Any well-armed attacker who "has the drop" on a crowd anywhere can inflict many casualties before being finally incapacitated; in fact guerrilla warfare techniques count on just this and can be/have been very effective when used against professional soldiers, or in recent cases against police.  In many of these mass shootings it's apparent that the shooter cares little whether he's taken down by his own bullet or the cops' or those of anyone else.
 
I'd think CCW would be more of a deterrent if everyone who advocated it actually carried everywhere all the time, but my guess would be that only a fraction regularly put their money where their mouth is.  In order to prevent a mass shooting or halt one in progress anyone carrying would have to be in a state of constant vigilance and alertness at all times while considering each and every person around them a potential threat and watch their movements accordingly, which would be impractical and exhausting to anyone who wasn't a paid law enforcement officer or security guard.  Perhaps attackers choose movie theaters or classrooms (of which there are more in abundance than hunting stores and gun shows) not because of the lack of armed resistance, but because of the large number of people who are lulled and distracted by the nature of activities that occur there.
 
Do you even remember what you post?
 
You brought up 9/11, not I, so does the truth that your beloved Republican Idol praised the very men that masterminded 9/11?
If you speak that theory and lived during the Reagan era(whom I consider the worst president of MY lifetime, btw), you speak as a fool. They were different times and we had to make shady alliances to accomplish our needs in the MUSLIM world at the time. It was the beginning of the end of the Cold War and we were supplying our ally Osama weapons and intelligence to defeat our rivals the Soviets.

REMEMBER?
 
Got news for you, most entities grease the palms of all the parties to ensure that they continue to operate. Look hard and I'm sure a lot of Democrats got some of that money. If they only gave to one party and that party loses, the new winner would have no problem doing away with them. Now go back to sleep, because party lines must divide and conquer.
 
Dog Wonder said:
How did you get into a thread about Nuts and Guns?
I wanted to enjoy some witty Wonder Dog one liners about libtard gun free zones, but alas your still fresh out I see.
 
Make sure you are up on the back row in your makeshift snipers nest with weapon at ready to protect all.

See Chock Jockey's post above.

Enjoy the movie.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top