Available A-340's - Thai

gaucho99

Senior
Dec 21, 2006
462
18
Thai Airways is looking to sell some A-340's. Do you think we'll go after them for the China routes or hold off since we asked to delay the route?

Thai plans to sell four Airbus 340-500 jets, which it uses for long-haul flights. "Despite the young age of the planes, (Thai Air President Apinan Sumanaseni) said it would be difficult to sell the long-haul aircraft as record oil prices are resulting in many airlines shifting to more profitable short- to medium-haul routes," the Journal writes.

http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/ite...k=51082878.blog
 
Quick - send an email to DP before they get snatched up by somebody else. I hear SWA is looking to reach out internationally......

Seriously, management has been completely in favor of the A330 over the A340 for some time now. Those big 4-engined jobs take off with 685,000 lbs. of fuel - roughly a hundred thousand gallons. Multiply times $4.00/gallon and you can see the problem.
 
NEVER HAPPEN! ! ! ! :rolleyes: :lol: Ya think they are selling them on the cheap? RIIIIIIIGHT! ! ! ! :blink:
 
NEVER HAPPEN! ! ! ! :rolleyes: :lol: Ya think they are selling them on the cheap? RIIIIIIIGHT! ! ! ! :blink:

Well, Thai is quoted as saying they are going to be difficult to sell considering the current economy and fuel prices. That would indicate they may have to sell them at a discount.....Probably not cheap but more than likely a good price for the buyer.
 
Quick - send an email to DP before they get snatched up by somebody else. I hear SWA is looking to reach out internationally......

Seriously, management has been completely in favor of the A330 over the A340 for some time now. Those big 4-engined jobs take off with 685,000 lbs. of fuel - roughly a hundred thousand gallons. Multiply times $4.00/gallon and you can see the problem.


Hey NLC, max fuel is 380,000 for the -500......

http://www.airbus.com/en/aircraftfamilies/...ifications.html
 
Thai Airways is looking to sell some A-340's. Do you think we'll go after them for the China routes or hold off since we asked to delay the route?



http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/ite...k=51082878.blog

Nope. Won't happen. Flying two engine ETOPS a/c an extra 45-60 minutes in order to stay within ETOPS limits is cheaper than flying four engines direct with today's oil prices. These four A340's will be the first of many very soon; including some 747-400's as well. Two engine a/c will be the future.
 
Well, Thai is quoted as saying they are going to be difficult to sell considering the current economy and fuel prices. That would indicate they may have to sell them at a discount.....Probably not cheap but more than likely a good price for the buyer.

Wouldn't matter if they were free. They still wouldn't be economical for US to operate to China at today's fuel prices.
 
Wouldn't matter if they were free. They still wouldn't be economical for US to operate to China at today's fuel prices.
Bingo. And please don't post obvious statements here; it may cut down on the whining, and then what? :lol:
 
Actually it is potentially feasible to use the -500 on PHL-PEK and still conserve fuel. All they need to do is significantly reduce the passenger and cargo sizes to a TOW compatible with a economically less than maximum fuel load for the journey. Also, a Polar routing typically has less environmental purturbations (e.g., wind), than an East-West routing. If the stated intent for this route is still valid (money looser for first 3 years (or so) and a "keyhole" into Asia), then why not use the -500s IF they can be leased at significant discount through 2013? This would also be a perfect aircraft (if fuel returns to reasonable levels) for NRT, HKG, DEL or possibly even SIN.
 
Can they be operated profitably on a route like PHL-ALB?

'Cause from what I've been reading on this board the last 3 years or so, that Delaware-sized patch of sky is the only place there's money to be made in aviation.
 

Latest posts