Bachmann: Hurricane Was A Message From God To Washington About Spending

[muff daddy]

I never claimed to have any inside information on anything. You said





That statement indicates that you have proof of her claim. If you think Rollins, McCain and Boehner are wrong in their claim your beef is with them not me. I have not seen anything written which proves there is any substance to what Bachmann, Westmorland, Gohmert and Franks are saying.


So Rollins, Boehner and McCain say Bachmann is full of crap. You say she is telling the truth. What proof do you have?





You said there are radicals in the Obama Administration. I am asking how you are defining radicals.



This does nothing to answer the question of who/what you define as radical.


So who exactly knows there has been 'penetration' of the US government and why are 'they' not doing anything to catch these people? Is Bachmann hot on their trail? Do you think she has let the FBI, NSA and SS in on her investigation or are they in on it too?

Sadly, people of your mindset think there will be a Normandy style invasion by Islamic radicals on horses bearing swords cutting off the heads of the infidels to wake up the people of the US.
Your government is welcoming them with open arms but I think you are too naive to see that.
Like I previously said, you need to do some research.

 

[Ms Tree]

Right, what ever you say.

You are the one who made the accusation. My reading dissagrees with your asrtion. You have the burden of proof. The fact that you are telling me to go look says you ain't got squat. What you are really saying is that your research (which you will not disclose) is the 'truth' and that my research which has not turned up any thing (hard to prove a negative) is wrong. So put your cards on the table or walk away.

 

[muff daddy]

Right, what ever you say.

You are the one who made the accusation. My reading dissagrees with your asrtion. You have the burden of proof. The fact that you are telling me to go look says you ain't got squat. What you are really saying is that your research (which you will not disclose) is the 'truth' and that my research which has not turned up any thing (hard to prove a negative) is wrong. So put your cards on the table or walk away.

I do not recall making an accusation.
Your lack of knowledge is not my liability.
Once again you are on this forum rambling about issues you have not a clue.

 

[Ms Tree]

I meant assertion not accusation.


You made an assertion with out supporting it yet I am the one with out a clue? What ever.

 

[muff daddy]

That statement indicates that you have proof of her claim.

What she said is true. Discount that.

Don't know where you went to school but that statement lays the onus of proof on your lap, guy. Duh?

You said there are radicals in the Obama Administration.

No, I believe if you check it was Bachman and what, 4 or 5 other Congressmen?

 

[Ms Tree]

If you make an assertion its up to you to prove it. Kind of like if i were.to say the earth is flat or that the moon landings were.fake. Its up to me to show proof.

You said that the obama administration had radicals in it. Again the onus is on you to at the very least explain who the radicals are.

 

[muff daddy]

Bachamnn, the gift that keeps giving.



Bachmann letter to Ellison

Rollins on Bachmann


She is loosing it big time. I cannot believe the people in MN are not voting her out.

If you make an assertion its up to you to prove it. Kind of like if i were.to say the earth is flat or that the moon landings were.fake. Its up to me to show proof.

And like I said, What she said is true. Discount that.
So with that assertion you made, prove she is losing it.

You said there are radicals in the Obama Administration.
Never said there are radicals in the Obama administration. It's quite obvious in your zeal to do a post slandering Michele Bachmann that you never read all 16 pages of her letter or you wouldn't have asked those questions. It shows your agenda.

The best you do is a 20 minute google search coupled with the Eleanor Woods reading dynamics course and now you are an expert. You posts prove it over and over.

Like I said before, you need to do more research.
You don't have a clue what this issue is about.

http://frontpagemag....mann-vs-mccain/

 

[Kev3188]

Bachmann is one entertaining beard, that's for sure...

 

[Ms Tree]

If you make an assertion its up to you to prove it. Kind of like if i were.to say the earth is flat or that the moon landings were.fake. Its up to me to show proof.

And like I said, What she said is true. Discount that.
So with that assertion you made, prove she is losing it.

She has no proof for her assertion, Several of her co-workers are saying she is wrong. Rollins who worked with her went so far as to say she is not good with facts sometimes. I feel that is adequate proof that she is loosing it.

You said there are radicals in the Obama Administration.
Never said there are radicals in the Obama administration. It's quite obvious in your zeal to do a post slandering Michele Bachmann that you never read all 16 pages of her letter or you wouldn't have asked those questions. It shows your agenda.

Yes you did. See below.

What do you expect from McCain who is a progressive?
Remember, McCain said Obama was a nice man.
What about the radicals in the Obama administration?
Why don't you do some research?
Penetration into our government has been known for a while.

The best you do is a 20 minute google search coupled with the Eleanor Woods reading dynamics course and now you are an expert. You posts prove it over and over.

Like I said before, you need to do more research.
You don't have a clue what this issue is about.

http://frontpagemag....mann-vs-mccain/

And yet your 'research' that you refuse to share is better and more valid for some reason? Sure. What ever you say.

 

[muff daddy]

Yes you did. See below.






And yet your 'research' that you refuse to share is better and more valid for some reason? Sure. What ever you say.

If you had read the 16 page letter you'd know what I meant.
What about the radicals in the Obama administration?


Your research is right under your nose and you still can not see it.

 

[muff daddy]

What about the radicals in the Obama administration?

Say what?

Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) yelled at Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano during a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Thursday over her refusal to answer simple questions about a member of the Homeland Security Advisory Council who stands accused by some members of Congress of leaking classified information to make Texas look like “Islamophobes.”
The man in question is Mohamed Elibiary, appointed by President Obama and allegedly affiliated with the Islamic Freedom and Justice Party in Egypt. Napolitano called the allegations against him “misleading” and “objectionable” and implied multiple times that Gohmert and others were accusing Elibiary of wrongdoing simply because he is Muslim.

 

[tom barry]

Bachmann is one entertaining beard, that's for sure...

Kev, 'beard' ??
That beaver might be 'bic'd' smooth as a baby's bottom ?

Hey southwind, you KNOW about 'such things' right ?????

 

[Kev3188]

Beard: A man or woman used as a cover for a gay partner

 

[777 fixer]

What do you expect from McCain who is a progressive?

I think his voting record says otherwise.

 

[777 fixer]

If you make an assertion its up to you to prove it. Kind of like if i were.to say the earth is flat or that the moon landings were.fake. Its up to me to show proof.

And like I said, What she said is true. Discount that.
So with that assertion you made, prove she is losing it.

I believe then that the burden of proff is on Bachman. What exactly has she proven? What I have seen all she has really proven is that when someone other than Glen Beck is asking her questions about her claims she can run real fast.

P.S. What about her ties to terrorism?