What's new

Bachmann: Hurricane Was A Message From God To Washington About Spending

My bad. I thought you had some facts to back up your assertion. Your post seemed to indicate you had some proof that Ms Abedin was tied to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Opponents of Reagan and Bush have said that they were nice men as well. Should we not believe them also?

How are you defining 'radical'? I suspect our definitions are different so I need to have a baseline for what I am looking for.

Michelle Bachmann may soon be done as a national or local political figure. She was "Redistricted" in such a way that the demographics of her new district make here quite vulnerable to being defeated.

Further she has a history of shooting off her mouth and thinking later. This latest ill timed and ill advised outburst is to be expected.
 
I believe then that the burden of proff is on Bachman. What exactly has she proven? What I have seen all she has really proven is that when someone other than Glen Beck is asking her questions about her claims she can run real fast.

P.S. What about her ties to terrorism?

She's merely asking how several people with what would be disqualifying background connections if you or I were vetted for a security clearance are getting them.

And in our Islamic PC no one is allowed to diss Allah and the socialists are messing their drawers over this.

She's still correct in her questions.
 
Didnt know being a Muslim disqualified one from obtaining a security clearance.
 
She's merely asking how several people with what would be disqualifying background connections if you or I were vetted for a security clearance are getting them.

And in our Islamic PC no one is allowed to diss Allah and the socialists are messing their drawers over this.

She's still correct in her questions.


They're disqualifying because Micelle Bachman says they are or because you say they are?
Let’s look down the rabbit hole that Micelle Bachman has dug. According to her Huma Abedin is a potential security risk because he late father founded an organization that received support from some guy who used to be the leader of an organization that might have had ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. Why didn’t you say so?! It's so OBVIOUS now. Add to that she marries a pro-Israel liberal Jew and holds a position of power with the Secretary of State. As we all know the Muslim Brotherhood is all about removing the glass ceiling for women.
Let me know when Micelle Bachman has actual evidence and not paranoid delusions.
 
They're disqualifying because Micelle Bachman says they are or because you say they are?
Let’s look down the rabbit hole that Micelle Bachman has dug. According to her Huma Abedin is a potential security risk because he late father founded an organization that received support from some guy who used to be the leader of an organization that might have had ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. Why didn’t you say so?! It's so OBVIOUS now. Add to that she marries a pro-Israel liberal Jew and holds a position of power with the Secretary of State. As we all know the Muslim Brotherhood is all about removing the glass ceiling for women.
Let me know when Micelle Bachman has actual evidence and not paranoid delusions.

Bachmann and four other members of Congress, but you're entirely focused only on Bachmann.
As previously stated, this issue is with the present admin giving security clearances away without proper vetting. Period.
Several in the Obama regime have very questionable ties and long associations to Hamas linked CAIR and the MB among a few.
If you tried to get a clearance and had similar ties to say, KKK or Aryan Nation would you be denied?
Bachmann and other members of the Intelligence Committee have a little more access than you or I and if they feel these ties and organizations should be investigated, maybe they should.
The question is why has the Obama administration turned a blind eye?
Sounds a bit like the canary in the coal mine.
What about the 'properly vetted' Mohamed Elibiary , famous for leaking highly sensitive intelligence documents to a media outlet in Texas.
It is a rabbit hole this admin has dug via PC appeasement and it looks like you may be a member.
 
Michelle Bachmann may soon be done as a national or local political figure. She was "Redistricted" in such a way that the demographics of her new district make here quite vulnerable to being defeated.

Further she has a history of shooting off her mouth and thinking later. This latest ill timed and ill advised outburst is to be expected.

I'd still hit it !
 
If you tried to get a clearance and had similar ties to say, KKK or Aryan Nation would you be denied?

So if my father who has been dead for almost twenty years was part of an organization that at one time had the support from the leader of another organization that might have had ties to the KKK I would be denied a security clearance? And I was married to a pro-Israel Jew becasue that's what hardcore KKK memebers do.
 
What about the 'properly vetted' Mohamed Elibiary , famous for leaking highly sensitive intelligence documents to a media outlet in Texas.

Robert Hanson was a hardcore Catholic who sold secrets to the Russians. Does than mean we give extra special attention to Catholics?
 
Who said she was not properly vetted? Does anyone have proff of this claim?

A State Department adviser has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Der Spiegel pointed out the obvious: “A certain role of the Muslim Brotherhood in the transition process [to ‘democracy’] in Egypt seems acceptable to the Obama White House.” It was early February 2011, the moment when the uprising that would oust Hosni Mubarak was bubbling over in Tahrir Square. The prominent German newsmagazine figured, who better to ask about the Muslim Brotherhood than the American political establishment’s resident foreign-policy genius, John McCain?

Maverick before the Bachmann question:

So, the reporter asked him, does Obama’s tolerance of the Muslim Brotherhood “concern you”?
Senator Maverick shot back without hesitation: “It concerns me so much that I am unalterably opposed to it. I think it would be a mistake of historic proportions.”
Senator McCain elaborated that he was “deeply, deeply concerned that this whole movement [toward democracy] could be hijacked by radical Islamic extremists.” And what, he was specifically asked, “is your assessment of the Muslim Brotherhood”? McCain pulled no punches:

I think they are a radical group that, first of all, supports sharia law; that in itself is anti-democratic — at least as far as women are concerned. They have been involved with other terrorist organizations and I believe that they should be specifically excluded from any transition government.​
In fact, so apprehensive was he over the Brotherhood and its sharia agenda that McCain was quick to brand Mohamed ElBaradei, the Nobel laureate, as a Brotherhood tool. Many of us watching developments at the time noted the apparent collusion between ElBaradei and the Brothers. McCain went farther: “Oh yeah, I think it’s very clear that the scenario is very likely he could be their front man.”

http://www.rightsidenews.com/2012072116695/us/homeland-security/questions-about-huma-abedin.html

The President and State are breaking federal law by letting known terrorists into the country and giving them audience at WH and you argue vetting is being done properly?
 
It is a rabbit hole this admin has dug via PC appeasement and it looks like you may be a member.

Whatever group that wants hard evidence and not baseless accusations that's the group I'm a member of. Now try using the word Jew instead of Muslim, Torah instead of Koran and Judism instead of Islam and tell me what group you seem to be a member. Or maybe I should be asking Rep Bachman that.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top