What's new

Bachmann: Hurricane Was A Message From God To Washington About Spending

That was never the issue, only MSM spun it that way.
The question was and still is about a seemingly high level of acess to this administration by the brotherhood and other radical islamic orginizations.
Bachmann and four others asked the IG to look into this and report to congress.
That's all.
Of course MSM pounced. What do you expect from the adminstrations first line of defense?

You're the one making accusations that she would never have gotten a security cleareance if she had been properly vetted. Providing no supporting evidence of this and resorting to name calling.
 
You problem is you don't even have the letter I refer to.
Talk about unsupported claims.

When you selectively edit a statement to fit your narrative, it has a different outcome.
You should include the full text of the entire statement you edited.

Something you seem to be very skilled at.
 
You're the one making accusations that she would never have gotten a security cleareance if she had been properly vetted. Providing no supporting evidence of this and resorting to name calling.

Never made any accusation regarding that, or are you going to selectively edit once more?
 
So your talking ab out un-named boogeymen who must not be named.

Once again, please read lsowly.
The whole question was about easy access and influence to this administration and has it been influencing policy decisions and why hasn't it been investigated.
The rest is MSM sputum.
 
Once again, please read lsowly.
The whole question was about easy access and influence to this administration and has it been influencing policy decisions and why hasn't it been investigated.
The rest is MSM sputum.

As soon as someone comes up with actual evidence to support said claims.

Best quote in all this came from a Muslim Brotherhood member when asked about it "We've penetrated the US government? We can't even penetrate the Egyptian government".
 
As soon as someone comes up with actual evidence to support said claims.

Best quote in all this came from a Muslim Brotherhood member when asked about it "We've penetrated the US government? We can't even penetrate the Egyptian government".

I hope it wasn't Mohamed Morsi Isa al-Ayyat or we'll be dancing again.
 
So if my father who has been dead for almost twenty years was part of an organization that at one time had the support from the leader of another organization that might have had ties to the KKK I would be denied a security clearance? And I was married to a pro-Israel Jew becasue that's what hardcore KKK memebers do.

Wow if those stupid infidels sign off on this, what else can we accomplish?
 
You're the one making accusations that she would never have gotten a security cleareance if she had been properly vetted. Providing no supporting evidence of this and resorting to name calling.

Funny, she was associate editor of the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs as recently as 2008, which is backed by the extreme radical World Association for Muslim Youth a youth organization (much like our Boy Scouts.) Also she was in that capacity when her mother published her radical book.

NRO 5/02
The World Assembly of Muslim Youth (WAMY) and International Islamic Relief Organization (IIRO) are two of Rabita Trust's sister organizations. The Wall Street Journal recently published an in-depth account of the ties between IIRO, Saudi al Qaeda financier Yassin al-Qadi and the 1998 African-embassy bombings. IIRO has been linked to planned attacks in Pakistan, India, the Philippines, and Africa.

WAMY was founded in the United States by Osama bin Laden's brother, Abdullah. The short WAMY book Islamic Views, printed by the Saudi government's Armed Forces Printing Press, contains passages such as, "[T]each our children to love taking revenge on the Jews and the oppressors, and teach them that our youngsters will liberate Palestine and al-Quds when they go back to Islam and make Jihad for the sake of Allah."

http://supportsecure...Sep-24-2008.pdf

Family affair?
Ryan Mauro 7/12
Her mother, Dr. Saleha Abedin, is a member of the Muslim Sisterhood, the Brotherhood’s female counterpart. She serves in the Bureau with the wife of Mohammed Morsi, Egypt’s new Brotherhood president.
She is also a member of the Muslim World League, which terrorism expert Andrew McCarthy describes as “the Muslim Brotherhood’s principal vehicle for the international propagation of Islamic supremacist ideology.” The organization she leads, the International Islamic Committee for Woman and Child, is part of the Muslim World League.
Her organization is not a moderate group that mistakenly got involved with the Muslim World League. Its charter is written by Brotherhood leaders including Sheikh Yousef al-Qaradawi, an open supporter of Hamas. It is therefore unsurprising that the organization wants to get rid of laws against marital rape, permit marriage below the age of 18 and institute other elements of Sharia Law. She is also a board member of the International Islamic Council for Dawa and Relief (which the group she leads is part of), a group banned in Israel because it belongs to Qaradawi’s Union of Good, a network of “charities” set up to fund Hamas. The U.S. froze the Union of Good’s assets in November 2008.
If you have any remaining doubt that Dr. Saleha Abedin subscribes to Islamist ideology, look at a book she translated and published by her organization in 1999 titled, “Women in Islam.” It says that man-made laws enslave women, which is an undeniable call for Sharia Law. It calls for legislation based on Sharia Law, such as stoning adulterers and eliminating the death penalty for those who kill apostates. The Center for Security Policy has a 28-page analysis of it.
Huma Abedin’s late father, Dr. Syed Abedin, was also intimately involved with Islamists. He led the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs based in Saudi Arabia. It is backed by the Muslim World League and is an entity of the World Assembly of Muslim Youth, a very extreme Islamist group. The Institute also published Mrs. Abedin’s book. Huma herself was an assisstant editor of the Institute’s journal as far back as 1996 and as recently as 2008, which means she was there when it published her mother’s extremist book. This screenshot from September 2008 shows that Huma, her mother and brother were all simultaneously editors of the journal.
Huma Abedin’s brother, Hassan, had a fellowship with the Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies, an entity that is very cozy with the Muslim Brotherhood, at the same exact time as Sheikh Yousef al-Qaradawi served on the board.
One close associate of the Abedin family is Abdullah Omar Naseef. He is the former Secretary-General of the Muslim World League. He founded the Rabita Trust, which had its assets frozen by the U.S. government in October 2001 for its support of terrorist groups.
Huma’s father met Naseef when he was a visiting professor at King Abdul Aziz University, where Naseef was the dean. There are mixed reports about whether Naseef or Huma’s father originally created the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs, but it was clearly a joint endeavor and was backed by Naseef’s Muslim World League. Huma, her mother and her brother have worked for the IMMA’s journal.
Naseef’s Rabita Trust has been renamed as Rabita al-Alam al-Islami. Huma’s mother is a member of it. Naseef and Huma’s mother are also on the Presidency Staff Council of the International Islamic Council for Dawa and Relief together under the leadership of Qaradawi. Naseef was also on the board of the Oxford Centre for Islamic States alongside Qaradawi when Hassan Abedin had a fellowship there. Naseef remains the chairman of the board.

My my, what a finely woven web we have here. You'd think someone with half a brain would consider looking into these questionable ties like Bachmann did.

Married to Anthony Weiner, member of the House Judiciary Committee, Member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee( which has the largest jurisdiction in the U.S. House, overseeing telecommunications, public health, air quality and environmental protection, the nation's energy policy, and interstate and foreign commerce). Member of the Homeland Security Task Force.
Huma Abedin, White House intern in 1996, was assigned to Hillary Clinton.Traveling chief of staff during the Clinton '08 campaign, now Deputy Chief of Staff to the US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton.

Wow, wouldn't that be the Oscar for a sleeper mole? Just think of all the BS Weiner has told her in the privacy of their own home or she has gleaned from some 16 years with Hillary. Wow.
And no one bats an eye.

As for vetting, here's DOS guidlines for disqualifying and (in the interest of fairness) qualifying.

Guideline B:
Foreign Influence

6. The Concern. Foreign contacts and interests may be a security concern if the individual has divided loyalties or foreign financial interests, may be manipulated or induced to help a foreign person, group, organization, or government in a way that is not in U.S. interests, or is vulnerable to pressure or coercioon by any foreign interest. Adjudication under this Guideline can and should consider the identity of the foreign country in which the foreign contact or financial interest is located, including, but not limited to, such considerations as whether the foreign country is known to target United States citizens to obtain protected information and/or is associated with a risk of terrorism.
7. Conditions that could raise a security concern and may be disqualifying include:
(a) contact with a foreign family member, business or professional associate, friend, or other person who is a citizen of or resident in a foreign country if that contact creates a heightened risk of foreign exploitation, inducement, manipulation, pressure, or coercion;
( b connections to a foreign person, group, government, or country that create a potential conflict of interest between the individual's obligation to protect sensitive information or technology and the individual's desire to help a foreign person, group, or country by providing that information;
(c counterintelligence information, that may be classified, indicates that the individual's access to protected information may involve unacceptable risk to national security;
(d) sharing living quarters with a person or persons, regardless of citizenship status, if that relationship creates a heightened risk of foreign inducement, manipulation, pressure, or coercion;
(e) a substantial business, financial, or property interest in a foreign country, or in any foreign-owned or foreign-operated business, which could subject the individual to heightened risk of foreign influence or exploitation;
(f) failure to report, when required, association with a foreign national;
(g) unauthorized association with a suspected or known agent, associate, or employee of a foreign intelligence service;
(h) indications that representatives or nationals from a foreign country are acting to increase the vulnerability of the individual to possible future exploitation, inducement, manipulation, pressure, or coercion;
(i) conduct, especially while traveling outside the U.S., which may make the individual vulnerable to exploitation, pressure, or coercion by a foreign person, group, government, or country.

8. Conditions that could mitigate security concerns include:

(a) the nature of the relationships with foreign persons, the country in which these persons are located, or the positions or activities of those persons in that country are such that it is unlikely the individual will be placed in a position of having to choose between the interests of a foreign individual, group, organization, or government and the interests of the U.S.;
( b there is no conflict of interest, either because the individual's sense of loyalty or obligation to the foreign person, group, government, or country is so minimal, or the individual has such deep and longstanding relationships and loyalties in the U.S., that the individual can be expected to resolve any conflict of interest in favor of the U.S. interest;
(c contact or communication with foreign citizens is so casual and infrequent that there is little likelihood that it could create a risk for foreign influence or exploitation;
(d) the foreign contacts and activities are on U.S. Government business or are approved by the cognizant security authority;
(e) the individual has promptly complied with existing agency requirements regarding the reporting of contacts, requests, or threats from persons, groups, or organizations from a foreign country;
(f) the value or routine nature of the foreign business, financial, or property interests is such that they are unlikely to result in a conflict and could not be used effectively to influence, manipulate, or pressure the individual.​
And of course, without a doubt I'm sure she has met the conditions which mitigate security concerns. There's absolutely no way our security apparatus would be asleep at the wheel with these type concerns.
 
Un named is a bit different from right/left but sine you like playing the victim. ......
 

Latest posts

Back
Top