Chicago Tribune Article

ohcaptainron

Member
Sep 12, 2002
98
1
David Greising
Board should match United''s good-faith effort
Published November 24, 2002
The government loan program that passed in those scary days after Sept. 11 is an easy target for criticism.
The program had the potential to become an unprecedented, direct bailout of an entire industry. It invited airlines to use taxpayer money to fix a host of ills that predated 9/11: costly management mistakes, greedy labor demands, unwieldy routes. The list goes on.
But let''s face it. Congress passed the program into law. Congress authorized up to $10 billion in guarantees.
And if a carrier such as United Airlines takes aggressive steps to cut costs and restore viability as the loan program demands, then the Air Transportation Stabilization Board should do what Congress wanted. It should hand over the money.
United is rapidly approaching that point.
It has cured the two biggest holes in the application it first filed in mid-June.
United last week locked in the latest of $5.5 billion in concessions from employees. And now it has proven that private-market sources of funding just simply are not available without government help.
Inexplicably, United had not made the latter case when it first filed for $1.8 billion in loan guarantees in June. Five long months later--five months during which United''s cash position shrunk 33 percent, to a tight $1.6 billion--the company finally has done that work.
Besides the many turndowns United does not want to talk about, it has restructured $500 million in debt with German lender Kreditanstalt fur Wiederaufbau. It has secured commitments toward $200 million in financial support from its global Star Alliance airline partners.
It is even in talks for $2 billion in debtor-in-possession financing--costly, just-in-case money United would use if forced into bankruptcy.
These are the signs of a company that has scoured the capital markets and come up with what little it could.
Add up the labor cuts, some scrounging for new capital and the debt talks, and United looks like an airline that has faced its dark prospects. And it still can see a future.
Now it needs the loan board''s help.
What the board does will show if it is serious about fulfilling its congressional mandate.
If the board denies United''s application, it may confirm suspicions of skeptics who fear the board is hewing more to conservative politics than to the save-the-airlines rhetoric President Bush dispensed when smoke still hung in the air of lower Manhattan.
David N. Skeel, a bankruptcy expert at the University of Pennsylvania law school, has published criticisms of the bailout program. But he now believes United''s case is persuasive in the context of the program Congress created.
If they don''t get the guarantees, you might suspect [the board] tried not to make it happen because their hearts weren''t in it in the first place, Skeel says.
The onus is on the loan board to reach its decision quickly and produce the financing promptly, too, if that''s the decision. It shouldn''t repeat what happened with US Airways, allowing the company to slide into bankruptcy while it waited for the board to deliver on an approval it had already granted.
The board so far has been appropriately tough in its dealing with applicants. It scared off other carriers who might have applied if they thought easy money was within reach.
Now the board has to do similarly tough work: assessing United''s applications on its merits. It needs to discount the kibitzing of competitors whose self-interest sometimes outweighs common sense. Its three members--a likely no vote from the Treasury Department representative, a likely yes vote from Transportation and a mystery vote from the Federal Reserve--need to set politics aside and look at the facts.
There are some nits left to pick. The biggest: United''s guarantee that mechanics'' and pilots'' wages will return to pre-Sept. 11 levels by 2008. That could sink a recovering airline.
A $375 million loan payment looms Dec. 2. A bankruptcy could follow days later if no loan guarantee is in place.
United''s management and labor leaders have done their work and put together an estimable application.
It''s time for the Air Transportation Stabilization Board to do its job, too.
Additional columns and columnist information are available in the online edition of chicagotribune.com. Older columns can be found in our archives.
Copyright © 2002, Chicago Tribune
 

Busdrvr

Veteran
Aug 20, 2002
2,217
0
[blockquote]
----------------
On 11/25/2002 11:28:16 AM ohcaptainron wrote:



There are some nits left to pick. The biggest: United's guarantee that mechanics' and pilots' wages will return to pre-Sept. 11 levels by 2008. That could sink a recovering airline.

----------------
[/blockquote]


By 2008? how evil. I guess the tribs never heard of a thing called inflation. So figuring 3% per year, the mechs and pilots will be 15% below 2001 levels
 

Busdrvr

Veteran
Aug 20, 2002
2,217
0
It's just sad that they can't write an entire article without a little bashing. I think they finally realize an UAL-free ORD would not be a good thing.
 

UAL777flyer

Veteran
Aug 20, 2002
730
0
Let's not slam the Trib too much. For once this is a pro-United piece of reporting. It must've found it's way into the Tribune by mistake!
 

Latest posts