Dihydrogen Monoxide

[Ch. 12]

You've brought nothing to the debate other than tired misused data that already there is question as to its accuracy.

You for some strange reason see oil as the root cause to all the planets evils.

So you are willing to dump gazillions into fixing a problem that you have no idea what the exact cause is?

That's a Dem knee jerk if I ever heard one.

Thanks, Dell. As always...you are wonderfully insightful and answer the real questions coming your way (did my sarcasm come through?) 🙄 Nice job at avoidance. Face it...you're on a platform with nothing holding it up.

 

[delldude]

Thanks, Dell. As always...you are wonderfully insightful and answer the real questions coming your way (did my sarcasm come through?) 🙄 Nice job at avoidance. Face it...you're on a platform with nothing holding it up.

No view except your view..... .... :down:

Do some research instead of buying it all...like I said......you stated we have to do something even though we don't know what is causing it....DUH :huh:

What does 'my team' gain from trying to tackle a problem that has mountains of evidence supporting it (though the exact causes are still debated) :cop: ?

I like how you went back and changed the wording of your post after you put your foot in your mouth.... Nyaa Nyaa, Gotcha

And again...WHAT agenda do I have? :cop:

Mountains of evidence supporting what we know not....there's a real oxymoron 😱

You refute everything.....no bias here........

Tell your coach I said Hi....

 

[Ch. 12]

No view except your view..... .... :down:

Do some research instead of buying it all...like I said......you stated we have to do something even though we don't know what is causing it....DUH :huh:





I like how you went back and changed the wording of your post after you put your foot in your mouth.... Nyaa Nyaa, Gotcha



Mountains of evidence supporting what we know not....there's a real oxymoron 😱

You refute everything.....no bias here........

Tell your coach I said Hi....

you have honest issues b/c you can't answer questions and turn into a 12 year-old when somebody calls you on it. Oh yeah...and you 'got me' alright since that was my original, unedited post. Not sure what crack you're smoking. I've said all along that the majority agrees that the earth is warming AT A RATE THAT IS THOUSANDS OF TIMES QUICKER THAN A 'NATURAL' RATE AS SEEN IN THE PAST. I've also said all along that the scientific community is divided on exactly what the SPECIFIC causes are but again...the majority note that it is inevitable influenced by man since it just so happens to coincide with our recent surge in polluting the atmosphere at phenomenal (but easily controllible if it wasn't made into a platform issue by your GOP) levels.

Man...I had enjoyed my time away b/c I had forgotten how little you bring to a debate and how often you retreat to the schoolyard. No substance. Nice debate.

 

[delldude]

Thank you for the kind words and I hope you have a joyous holiday.

Your boy Al Gore built the platform in case you didn't notice.What a Nobel man.

Well its quite obvious that no platform is right unless its your platform....

 

[Ch. 12]

Thank you for the kind words and I hope you have a joyous holiday.

Your boy Al Gore built the platform in case you didn't notice.What a Nobel man.

Well its quite obvious that no platform is right unless its your platform....

So I'll just assume that your twists and turns to avoid answering mean that you agree with me and/or can't refute that the repubs are the only ones that gain something from their stance on this issue. Denying that global warming exists in the face of mounting evidence will support their case to further beef up the few corporations that are still making 10s of billions a quarter while silently killing the economy (can you say "great cars, Detroit"?). And you will also agree, then, that 'my side' doesn't gain anything from their stance (duh) but that the economy could gain from our scientific improvements AND our future would be based on the 21st century instead of the 19th. Thanks for agreeing. Divert!! Divert!! Can't handle it!!!

 

[Seatacus]

I've said all along that the majority agrees that the earth is warming AT A RATE THAT IS THOUSANDS OF TIMES QUICKER THAN A 'NATURAL' RATE AS SEEN IN THE PAST.

I must have missed it. What is the "natural rate" and what is the "current rate". Numbers please. or at least give me a credible website to check.

 

[delldude]

Global warming is a hypothesis....a theory.....you proved no one knows how or even if it is.

I care not what the Republicans and Democrats views are.

Your side....my side...what are you talking about.....

You have serious issues my friend.

 

[delldude]

I must have missed it. What is the "natural rate" and what is the "current rate". Numbers please. or at least give me a credible website to check.

You sent it back to its coach for answers......wait a day or two.....

 

[delldude]

I've said all along that the majority agrees that the earth is warming AT A RATE THAT IS THOUSANDS OF TIMES QUICKER THAN A 'NATURAL' RATE AS SEEN IN THE PAST.

Ahhh...the sky is falling......

Explain how a hundred years of collected data automatically overides

some 4 million years of unknown change.

You and the majority of scientists have access to data showing

this natural rate over the last 4 million unknown years?

 

[delldude]

Of course its right wing propaganda ............

Secondly, 2008 was the year when any pretence that there was a "scientific consensus" in favour of man-made global warming collapsed. At long last, as in the Manhattan Declaration last March, hundreds of proper scientists, including many of the world's most eminent climate experts, have been rallying to pour scorn on that "consensus" which was only a politically engineered artefact, based on ever more blatantly manipulated data and computer models programmed to produce no more than convenient fictions.

 

[UAL_TECH]

S.F. fliers may pay their way in carbon usage

Excerpt:

San Francisco's Airport Commission has authorized the program, which will involve a $163,000 investment from SFO, but is still working out the details with 3Degrees. Because of that, McDougal said, he can't yet discuss specifics, such as the cost to purchase carbon offsets and what programs would benefit from travelers' purchases.

But the general idea, officials said, is that a traveler would approach a kiosk resembling the self-service check-in stations used by airlines, then punch in his or her destination. The computer would calculate the carbon footprint and the cost of an investment to offset the damage. The traveler could then swipe a credit card to help save the planet. Travelers would receive a printed receipt listing the projects benefiting from their environmental largesse.

The carbon offsets are not tax deductible, said Krista Canellakis, a 3Degrees spokeswoman.

"While the carbon offsets purchased at kiosks can't be seen or touched, they are an actual product with a specific environmental claim whose ownership is transferred at the time of purchase," she said.

 

[tech2101]

S.F. fliers may pay their way in carbon usage

Excerpt:

YHTBFKM!