The comments about "shunning" Saudi reminds me how hard it was for South African Airways because of national policy. Apartheid didn't stop airlines like BA from flying to JNB, but there certainly was a growing stigma attached to companies doing business there prior to 1990. SAA was banned outright from flying to the US and Australia, and few countries would allow them to overfly their airspace. There was also the partial economic embargo from the Reagan era (the Republican led Senate overrode his veto) they were banned from flying to the US, but apparently working with Boeing was OK....
Had de Klerk not started the moves to abolishing apartheid, SAA would have never been able to grow to the stature they are today, or partner with AA and Delta during the 1990's when they were allowed to start flying to the US again. Just as questionable is whether or not they could have been admitted into Star Alliance?..
-----
So... a question to ponder...
I seriously doubt anyone in Congress will be moved to try stand up to Saudi Arabia because of oil, sadly, but in all the debate over whether or not DL is in the wrong, I still think there's an underlying issue being ignored. There's no such thing as freedom of religion in Saudi Arabia.
Are there ethical lines that shouldn't be crossed when creating cross-border business partnerships? Isn't freedom of religion one of those?
To be clear -- I'm not intersted in anyone continuing to bash DL or any other airline.... just more interested in getting some opinions....
We and other countries openly shunned South Africa's abhorrent government policies to the extent that they were ultimately reversed. With religious freedom being one of the main reasons this country was first settled, and a core principle in our Constitution, should we not also be standing a little firmer for something the Founding Fathers believed in?...