What's new

Fallon Disses Obama

10155281_875074149186326_770352474_n.png
 
Only if he missed the big "Satire" heading.
 
700UW said:
 
Lets see his transcripts if he's so smart.
 
 
Barack Obama did not graduate with honors at Columbia and so his acolytes make much of his time at Harvard where he was president of the Harvard Law Review and where he graduated magna cum laude. Many ignore that his magna cum laude honors may well not been magna cum laude today. Under the system in place when Obama was a student,  only one third of a graduating class did not receive honors. For the class of ’95, a whopping 71.3 percent of the student body graduated with honors, doubling the number of students graduating with honors since 1972 and tripling the numbers receiving magna cum laude. Receiving magna cum laude may be impressive, but it is less so, if one in six students win it.
 
Eventually the Harvard Law faculty voted overwhelmingly to make it harder to get honors, a policy change that cut the number of students graduating with honors in half, according to The Harvard Law Record, a student newspaper of Harvard Law School.  Under the old system, all students had to do was reach a GPA cutoff. Given the stiff competition, professors felt pressure to inflate the grades of their favorite students. Under the new system, only the top ten percent of students received magna cum laude.  (Victoria Kuohung, “Class of ’99 May Find Honors Harder to Earn,” Harvard Law Record, February 16, 1996).   
smoking_47.gif
 
Finally got to a computer that could run the video.  That was pretty funny.
 
Ms Tree said:
How do the 'do'ers' learn to do?
By doing?... Most of what I've needed to know for every job I've had in the past 25 years was learned on the job... not in a classroom, or from a book.

Before I was in the airlines, I actually taught high school for a couple years. Over half of the dozen or so classes I took on "how to teach" were from people who'd never actually worked in the public school system -- they'd gone to work for the university after finishing their masters and/or doctorates. Then I figured out that working as a ticket agent paid more and offered far better benefits, and haven't looked back.

Maybe after I retire, I'll go into teaching again for the fun of it. There's no accountability, and I'd get summers off.
 
Goody for you.  I was given basic training for my various jobs and then honed it in application.  I can think of a few jobs where OJT might not be a good idea.  Most of the jobs I can think of that are OJT do not really require a great deal of skill.  If you can learn it with out any training, how hard can the job really be?  Not like you can be a pilot, Dr, nurse, Lawyer, architect or any number of other skilled professions just by doing it.
 
I think teaching is a very noble profession and I have the utmost respect for those that do it well.  I have had a few that had a huge impact on my life.  
 
Teaching at the K-12 level, I'll agree with you.

But at the university level? You can keep 'em.

Medicine most definitely has an OJT component -- internship-residency. Likewise with an apprenticeships in a trade, and building up your hours as a pilot. You can do the school/book work, but the real learning is hands on, not in a lab or lecture.
 
eolesen said:
Most of what I've needed to know for every job I've had in the past 25 years was learned on the job... not in a classroom, or from a book.
 

 
eolesen said:
Teaching at the K-12 level, I'll agree with you.

But at the university level? You can keep 'em.

Medicine most definitely has an OJT component -- internship-residency. Likewise with an apprenticeships in a trade, and building up your hours as a pilot. You can do the school/book work, but the real learning is hands on, not in a lab or lecture.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top