Fuel hedging

once again they already gave their guidance - you obviously love it since they didn't raise it up - so let's sum it up this way:
 
Translation for everyone:
 
Revenue - DL is so much better here - AA will suck at revenue
Expense - DL is so much better here - AA will such at expense
Alphabet soup of made up measures - DL is so much better here - AA will suck at every measure
 
While you continue to hammer, and hammer and hammer on everything AA does it does not change anything - I think we should start the count down clock to Chapter 7
 
Also, how much money is DL going to lose building up their LATAM flying and creating a MIA hub - interesting they want to do that now with all the market conditions, currency issues, etc you keep saying exist in LATAM - what does DL know about LATAM that you don't that would make them ignore all your negatives with LATAM and push forward - will it take 10 years or more like NYC did?
 
It will be fun to watch the twist and turns
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
Interesting you are pushing the theory DL is building it's LATAM network and now you can't back it up with how they are going to be able to address the issues AA is having - can't do it can you
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
And yet MEM was largely an RJ airport, yep DL is going to use those RJs to make a hub in MIA.
 
WT you are a joke.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
actually, DL upsized the RJs at MEM to build at hub at LGA where DL and JFK where DL has managed to become the largest carrier in the NYC local market.

If/when MIA is developed into a DL gateway to Latin America, it will be done using mainline aircraft.
 
This is great - we are now "upsizing" MEM - you can't make this stuff up can you
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people