What's new

Iam District 141 Employee Salary

700UW said:
What about Wolf, Gangwal, Siegle, Nagin and Lakefield?

That is much worse.

And live in the shoes of an AGC or GC then complain.
[post="239201"][/post]​
This is just a typical response from a hard core, union guy!!!! CEO's/ upper level management of ALL corporations make that kind of money!! The BOD's control that......NOT the employees under their control. Average employees will NEVER control executive pay/benefits, NEVER!! Is this fair?....Do most people agree with the disparity in executive vs rank and file compensation?.......Hell No!!!...But, thats not the point of this thread. The point is, AGC/upper union officer pay. They supposedly REPRESENT their respective members.....Those members are getting CRUSHED in wages and benefits/losing employment, union membership declining in rapid numbers. Upper union officals getting that kind of pay??? Plaeeease!!! I now understand why the people entrenched in their positions at the local level try to cut anyones throat who tries to encroach on their turf!!! Delldude, ring a bell, or sound familiar?? Look at your local for the answer. D Tks, et al????, E. L?? The entrenched ones, and those that are "in the know" see the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow!!!!! What a joke!!!!!! :down: GOOD DAY!!!!!
 
We have seen people run for office to oust the incumbents but the IAM contstution is set up to be as hard as possable to get new people in office. If you want to get into office you have to kiss alot of @#$ to become a "made" man in this union. Its run like some kind of mafia!

In the end its like this ,the IAM just wants you to shut the Hell up and just keep paying you ever increasing union dues!
 
roadtrip said:
We have seen people run for office to oust the incumbents but the IAM contstution is set up to be as hard as possable to get new people in office. If you want to get into office you have to kiss alot of @#$ to become a "made" man in this union. Its run like some kind of mafia!

In the end its like this ,the IAM just wants you to shut the Hell up and just keep paying you ever increasing union dues!
[post="239227"][/post]​
WELL SAID!!!!!!!!! Thats it in a nutshell.... Like your no BS response Roadtrip..... Just the facts! :up:
 
700UW said:
What about Wolf, Gangwal, Siegle, Nagin and Lakefield?

That is much worse.

And live in the shoes of an AGC or GC then complain.
[post="239201"][/post]​

Patent leather shoes no doubt!!!

The stockholders have more say in what the executives get than the members do in what the International officers get.

Comparing union officials to executives in such a way reveals the twisted business union nature of the organization.

Even from a purely busieness perspective it is entirely inappropriate for union officials to grant themselves raises when the union is failing in every possible measure. Members living standards are falling and membership has fallen by 25% between the last two Conventions. Why are these people being rewarded for destroying the union and screwing the membership?
 
700UW said:
Look in the mirror, you are the union, not 4 or 5 representatives.
[post="239210"][/post]​
"Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain, I am the geat OZ"

You are USAIR, not the executives and the stockholders right?

What happens when you lose your job at USAIR? Are you still the Union, not the 4 or 5 representatives?

The fact is that you are as much a part of the IAM as you are of USAIR, and you are just as disposable to one as the other. The company wants your labor and the IAM wants your dues, neither one really cares what you want.
 
jetmechline said:
DISTRICT 142:

http://union-reports.dol.gov/olmsWeb/docs/formspg.html File #020774

Nothing here about 141m officers because they are now defunct. File # was 542-789
[post="239328"][/post]​

Isnt transparancy great?

The unions desperately fought not to have to provide more detailed LM-2s.

They were worried that their "enemies" would use the information against them. They are probably right but the enemies that they speak of are not who you might think they are. The enemies are their own members that believe in democracy and accountability.

If you want even more info request cpoies of IRS form 5500 from the DOL. This form shows you the nice pension plans that union officers have provided for themselves with your dues while telling you to accept concessions.

Between the LM-2s and the 5500s it all comes together why these unions will do anything to maintain the uninterupted flow of dues at any price to you, because its good for them!!! And as long as you remain in the IAM you cant do a damn thing about it, you cant vote these guys out of office and you cant stop paying dues.
 
Exellent posts Bob,

Todays unions will continue to loose, until they are willing to risk DUES.
 
Frank only earns his lead inspector pay from US, he does not get a salary from the District or International.
 
700,
Unless you have seen his W-2 or his pay stub you would not know what he gets. I think you could be shocked.

- He is paid well............very well!

--Why do you think they wanted him re-elected?

---Frank could be what some call a good investment.

----I hear it would be wise to look at his pay stubs starting from the week after the contract in 1999 was signed until now.



:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :down:
 
roadtrip said:
We have seen people run for office to oust the incumbents but the IAM contstution is set up to be as hard as possable to get new people in office. If you want to get into office you have to kiss alot of @#$ to become a "made" man in this union. Its run like some kind of mafia!

In the end its like this ,the IAM just wants you to shut the Hell up and just keep paying you ever increasing union dues!
[post="239227"][/post]​
no no no dude...people have come and they failed to win ...ask billy"purple haze"...i remember quite correctly he ccontested each time he ran and did succeed in getting a run off again and once again lost for the what,3rd time in a row??
cut me a break......if you want new people in office you got to get someone who is electable by a majority.......not some hobo who's only popular on 2nd shift in h5....
 
Gee.........why do some people have to have the retirees vote them in? The retirees have no business voting. But, then again none of the working slugs could get off their duff to come and change the by-law so let the bums reap what they sowed.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top