Who sets the reps' pay?700UW said:Look in the mirror, you are the union, not 4 or 5 representatives.
[post="239210"][/post]
Who sets the reps' pay?700UW said:Look in the mirror, you are the union, not 4 or 5 representatives.
[post="239210"][/post]
This is just a typical response from a hard core, union guy!!!! CEO's/ upper level management of ALL corporations make that kind of money!! The BOD's control that......NOT the employees under their control. Average employees will NEVER control executive pay/benefits, NEVER!! Is this fair?....Do most people agree with the disparity in executive vs rank and file compensation?.......Hell No!!!...But, thats not the point of this thread. The point is, AGC/upper union officer pay. They supposedly REPRESENT their respective members.....Those members are getting CRUSHED in wages and benefits/losing employment, union membership declining in rapid numbers. Upper union officals getting that kind of pay??? Plaeeease!!! I now understand why the people entrenched in their positions at the local level try to cut anyones throat who tries to encroach on their turf!!! Delldude, ring a bell, or sound familiar?? Look at your local for the answer. D Tks, et al????, E. L?? The entrenched ones, and those that are "in the know" see the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow!!!!! What a joke!!!!!! :down: GOOD DAY!!!!!700UW said:What about Wolf, Gangwal, Siegle, Nagin and Lakefield?
That is much worse.
And live in the shoes of an AGC or GC then complain.
[post="239201"][/post]
WELL SAID!!!!!!!!! Thats it in a nutshell.... Like your no BS response Roadtrip..... Just the facts!roadtrip said:We have seen people run for office to oust the incumbents but the IAM contstution is set up to be as hard as possable to get new people in office. If you want to get into office you have to kiss alot of @#$ to become a "made" man in this union. Its run like some kind of mafia!
In the end its like this ,the IAM just wants you to shut the Hell up and just keep paying you ever increasing union dues!
[post="239227"][/post]
jack mama said:Does anyone have the report for DL 142??
[post="239235"][/post]
700UW said:What about Wolf, Gangwal, Siegle, Nagin and Lakefield?
That is much worse.
And live in the shoes of an AGC or GC then complain.
[post="239201"][/post]
"Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain, I am the geat OZ"700UW said:Look in the mirror, you are the union, not 4 or 5 representatives.
[post="239210"][/post]
jetmechline said:DISTRICT 142:
http://union-reports.dol.gov/olmsWeb/docs/formspg.html File #020774
Nothing here about 141m officers because they are now defunct. File # was 542-789
[post="239328"][/post]
no no no dude...people have come and they failed to win ...ask billy"purple haze"...i remember quite correctly he ccontested each time he ran and did succeed in getting a run off again and once again lost for the what,3rd time in a row??roadtrip said:We have seen people run for office to oust the incumbents but the IAM contstution is set up to be as hard as possable to get new people in office. If you want to get into office you have to kiss alot of @#$ to become a "made" man in this union. Its run like some kind of mafia!
In the end its like this ,the IAM just wants you to shut the Hell up and just keep paying you ever increasing union dues!
[post="239227"][/post]