Let's comparison shop!
http://twu514.org/files/2012/04/USA-IAM-Mx-Agreement-Effective-April-3-2008.pdf
Do any of you worry about keeping your seniority should the IAM prevail? They don't exactly have a great track record at protecting the seniority of members.
Josh
I read through some of the CBA for M&R this past Friday and it was not that impressive to me. I looked at scope, classifications, pay, overtime and some other areas of the agreement, holidays were a plus but that was pretty much it...
And the TWU SCOPE clause just recently allowed Landing Gear, CFM-56 Engine Work, and Bioler Rooom work to be outsourced, not to mention the 757 Airframes to TIMCO. All but the 757 Airframe issue Arbitrated and Lost. Your current TWU Scope basically only requires AA to notify and discuss with the Union, no other restriction applies.
Once again, you fail to hold your precious TWU to the same standard you would hold others too.
Take the blinders off a check on the reality of your situation!
Also remember this, you are comparing a current consensual TWU agreement to an IAM agreement that twice went through Bankurptcy. Compare that IAM agreement to your current 1113 c ask that will soon be shoved down your throat and then get back with us on what you find then.
Since you to love to hammer away on me about the above outsourcing cases this is my opinion. I believe those cases gave us a better understanding of what we must do in future discussion with the company. I could think of many instances were we have both the manpower and facilities and equipment available to discourage the company from following through with outsourcing and taking their chances in arbitration through the current scope of our agreement. With a better, more prepared up front plan exposed to the company in the beginning they would think twice about sending the work out and for the Union coming up short and not covering all of the available options in these meetings makes it very hard to be successful at arbitration. Hopefully something has been learned from this because I believe there could have been a better outcome because I believe in our Scope.
Also if our scope is so bad as you say Informer why is the company so desperate to change it?
Its true I'm comparing our current TWU agreement to the IAM agreement, as well as the failed 2010 TA, but like you say compare it to the 1113c ask and some of what I saw mirrored what they want to shove down our throats....