What's new

IT'S..FINALLY.........OFFICIAL...!

I believe this is the link you meant?

Former aide blames Bush for leak deceit


Sounds like a he said, she said thing. There is not enough time to start impeachment and give the fat that we are in an election cycle and the fact that Bush/Cheney are already inconsequential it is not in anyones interest to proceed with impeachment hearings. Had McCellan come out earlier instead of waiting to drop a bomb and make his book sell better, perhaps thing may have been different. That little SOB should be up on obstruction charges. I do not know if he was deposed but if was, he should be up on perjury charges as well.

This is as corrupt a government as we have ever had. What makes this SOB's stand apart from the rest of the rif raf in government, is that this time people are getting killed in the name of freedom and oil. It will be interesting to see how history judges these two clowns.
 
AGAIN, when I correctly type it.....it will not take.

Maybe it has something to do with the word....CIA..in the address

HELP !!
 
I believe this is the link you meant?

Former aide blames Bush for leak deceit

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~

YES, Garfield...thats it,....................Thank you.

I KNOW that I've typed web addresses on here that were longer than that one, AND they were ok.

I think maybe, my PC is being..."Observed"

If so............................................FUUK THEM !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
How long before delldude or one of his neo-con cronies try to blame this on the Clinton's as well??? :lol: :lol:

Bush most recently addressed the issue in July after commuting Libby's 30-month prison term. He acknowledged that some in the White House were involved in the leak. Then, after repeatedly declining to discuss the ongoing investigation, he said the case was closed and it was time to move on.

Okie dokie, el chimpo, but what happened to your threat to fire anybody who illegally outed a CIA official? Does that mean you've fired yourself and tricky dick??? YEAH!!!

Bush himself stated on September 30, 2003, that he would "take appropriate action" against "anybody in my administration who leaked classified information."

Neither McClellan nor Bush said anything about "knowingly" leaking information; nor did they stipulate that a conviction must occur before a firing. And with good reason: An inadvertent leak that doesn't lead to conviction is still a serious matter. It still is, after all, the disclosure of classified information. Whether the disclosure was due to malice or carelessness, it still suggests that the leaker may not be capable of keeping classified information secure. :shock:
 
How long before delldude or one of his neo-con cronies try to blame this on the Clinton's as well??? :lol: :lol:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Well..Delldude does,nt need me to speak for him, but I'm sure Dell knew all along it was true, it was just easier if it had'nt come "out" before EL-CHIMPO departed.
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Well..Delldude does,nt need me to speak for him, but I'm sure Dell knew all along it was true, it was just easier if it had'nt come "out" before EL-CHIMPO departed.

I know, you're right, but for delldude to admit the president he so admires is a liar and a cheat, he would have to show some humility, good luck with that.
 
Plausible deniabilty.........

Hearsay is the legal term that describes statements made outside of court or other judicial proceedings. With few exceptions, hearsay is not allowed as evidence in the United States.

You guys think I worship 'W'...you're in for a surprise.....He, like Clinton has done things I both like and

dislike...
 
Plausible deniabilty.........

Hearsay is the legal term that describes statements made outside of court or other judicial proceedings. With few exceptions, hearsay is not allowed as evidence in the United States.

You guys think I worship 'W'...you're in for a surprise.....He, like Clinton has done things I both like and

dislike...


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Dell,
You do/say what you want, that's understood by me.

And Yes, I believe your sincere about your likes/dislikes about Bush/Clinton.

But you don't do yourself justice by the plausibility/denial stuff :down:
 
Plausible deniabilty.........

Hearsay is the legal term that describes statements made outside of court or other judicial proceedings. With few exceptions, hearsay is not allowed as evidence in the United States.

You guys think I worship 'W'...you're in for a surprise.....He, like Clinton has done things I both like and

dislike...

???? On one hand you claim el chimpo has done things you dislike, then you throw out the cheap attempt at an excuse for said el chimpo. What am i missing?
 
I think he's saying all presidents insulate themselves from involvement using plausible deniability.As to the other,it's not a sworn statement made in a trial or testimony.Thus one can make many claims without proving it unless you are one who believes everything they read as the truth.
 
Mcclellan is now saying Bush "did'nt know".

The hard reality is, that Bush, as all presidents, will be insulated, he's already pardoned Libby, he definitely would pardon Rove(if it came to that), so the ONLY one to GO AFTER is DIRTY DICK.

For LEGITIMATE REASONS, congress should make Dirty "Dicko" the next Spiro Agnew.

As I've opined many times here, Jimmy Carter has....DEFINITELY lost his title as "the WORST POTUS !!
 
Favorite Presidential past time?

Truman lied... Eisenhower lied... Kennedy lied... Johnson lied and lied and lied... Nixon lied... The American public was lied to month by month by each of these five administrations. As I say, it's a tribute to the American public that their leaders perceived that they had to be lied to. It's no tribute that it was so easy to fool the public.


Interesting,Bush lied.
 
Back
Top