J.p. Morgan

AAviator

Veteran
Nov 12, 2002
1,385
633
J.P. Morgan sees 2006 profit at Continental, AMR

SAN FRANCISCO (AFX) -- With so much pessimism in the airline industry, investors may be overlooking improving prospects at AMR Corp., Continental Airlines and elsewhere in the rattled sector, J.P. Morgan analysts said Tuesday.

"We feel better about the broader sector's risk-reward profile than at any prior time this decade," wrote J.P. Morgan analyst Jamie Baker.

Despite more red ink expected in the fourth quarter at American Airlines' parent AMR Corp. and Continental Airlines, J.P. Morgan upgraded shares of the carriers because of expected profit next year as capacity shrinks and revenue rises.

"Despite improved prospects and a hasty retreat in jet [kerosene] prices, AMR/CAL shares are still below pre-Katrina levels," wrote Baker.

He now rates AMR and Continental at overweight, according to a Tuesday note. A profit of $1.60 a share is expected in 2006 at AMR, not the 50-cent loss estimate that had been forecast by Baker.

At Continental, his 2006 profit forecast for the company is now $1.15 a share, instead of a loss of 90 cents.

At the same time, analyst Jamie Baker reduced the ratings on Southwest Airlines and AirTran Holdings because of the upgrade of the two other airlines.

"While our desire for a balanced ratings spectrum regrettably pushes AirTran and Southwest down a notch, our enthusiasm for these names (particularly the latter) is not reduced in absolute," he wrote.

Baker expects higher 2006 earnings at Southwest and AirTran, as well as Alaska Air Group and JetBlue Airways .

Revenue for the industry is expected to increase in the fourth quarter -- as capacity comes down -- and will rise further in 2006.

"Perhaps the sell-side community (until today including ourselves) has simply become too gun-shy given a litany of unexpected, nasty surprises; 9/11, the Gulf War, SARS and most recently, surging crude," Baker wrote.

The upgrade of Continental and AMR comes as rivals United Airlines , Northwest Airlines and Delta Air Lines are now restructuring in bankruptcy and even low-cost carrier JetBlue is fighting hard to make a profit.

In the recently reported third quarter, Continental was profitable but forecast a loss in the fourth quarter because of the financial burden of rising jet fuel prices.

AMR Corp. lost money during the third quarter, and expects a loss in the fourth quarter.

This story was supplied by MarketWatch. For further information see www.marketwatch.com.
 
Could that be the reason for the "rush" for more concessions?


Could be a repeat of the infamous 6 1/5% over six year 1995 contract. Those were the most profitable years in AMR's history and they knew in advance to give us a generous 1% a year increase.
 
You both are giving management way too much credit. First - management had the foresight that Jamie Baker would stick his neck out from the rest of the Wall Street pack and predict a profit for 2006 and as a result begans seeking "concessions" well in advance? And then - management predicted the fast times of the late 1990s on the heels of a recession and tricked its labor unions into meager pay raises? With an exclusive lock on the crystal ball, you would have thought that management would have also foreseen the results of Reno, TWA, 9/11, and the spike in fuel prices. One would think that we would be perpetually profitable on the backs of the unions.

I don't think anyone has the type of foresight that you accuse AA management of having. If anyone did, WN wouldn't be a $12B company trading at a 30 P/E on a dwindling supply of hedging gains.
 
Just think -- if we were to be back at $1B in profits in 2006 and remained that way, it would take about 5 to 10 years just to pay off the debt we've amassed since our last profitable year... And that assumes we don't buy any new aircraft.
 
Just think -- if we were to be back at $1B in profits in 2006 and remained that way, it would take about 5 to 10 years just to pay off the debt we've amassed since our last profitable year... And that assumes we don't buy any new aircraft.

Should have went bankrupt and wiped out all that debt :lol:
 
Should have went bankrupt and wiped out all that debt

Sounds great, except that only unsecured debt gets wiped out in Ch.11, and for AMR that's somewhere around $2B out of the $20B in debt. The rest is secured by aircraft, equipment, real estate, and route authorities.

If you want to give up the entire 777 and 737 fleet, then it might be worth it. Otherwise, by the time you start adding in legal fees and higher interest rates going forward, it's just not worth it from a debt perspective.
 

Latest posts