What's new

Jack Knows Pto And Opus

Why is it so hard for you to understand that NW doesnt care what you want?
No company is there for the pure enrichment and enjoyment of the worker. It's first order of business is to SURVIVE.

After that a company must work for BALANCE between employees, investors, and customers.

When a company declares bankruptcy, it's very survival is at stake. (Does everyone get that?)


A company that give all their workers everything they want is doomed to failure. Seriously.

If anyone believes a company complete exists only for workers . . . well, that's a very socialist view. And socialism isn't very American.
 
Why is it so hard for you to understand that NW doesnt care what you want? You will do what they tell you to do and if you dont like it then you can leave. You have no voice in how NW operates or how they dictate to you what you will or wont do. If they tell you that your off days are tuesday, thursday then that is what they are. If they tell you that you cant bring a cellphone on the property then you dont bring one, its just that simple. You are a pawn that NW uses how they wish, when they wish.

I understand that to its fullest extent however I will keep my phone with me and continue to call my family on my regular schedules and if Northwest chooses to fire me over it so be it. I call home every morning and every evening and it is done during the slow times at work now when/if we go to eight hour days this will not be an issue but until then they are going to have to deal with it or send me and many others on our way. Why do you always blow simple things out of proportion? Also why do you guys think that it is a bad thing for us when this contract is over and Northwest no longer needs us? That is the way contract work works. We know this job is not permanent and that one day it will be over, that is for the ones that did not roll over.
 
No company is there for the pure enrichment and enjoyment of the worker. It's first order of business is to SURVIVE.

After that a company must work for BALANCE between employees, investors, and customers.

When a company declares bankruptcy, it's very survival is at stake. (Does everyone get that?)


A company that give all their workers everything they want is doomed to failure. Seriously.

If anyone believes a company complete exists only for workers . . . well, that's a very socialist view. And socialism isn't very American.
No Union response?
 
No company is there for the pure enrichment and enjoyment of the worker. It's first order of business is to SURVIVE.

After that a company must work for BALANCE between employees, investors, and customers.

When a company declares bankruptcy, it's very survival is at stake. (Does everyone get that?)


A company that give all their workers everything they want is doomed to failure. Seriously.

If anyone believes a company complete exists only for workers . . . well, that's a very socialist view. And socialism isn't very American.

Survival of ‘The Company’?
Why?
Survival of the 'company' at the expense of the employees, shareholders, bondholders, contractors, etc… (of which employees were once shareholders) is not admirable.

Why should the company survive?

Oh, that’s right…………..
Executives and Pilots………..

“And socialism isn't very American.†🙄

Guess we should erase FDR from the books as we are headed in the opposite direction.
 
Well Big E that is indeed a comment. If FDR knew that his social programs were going to turn into the money draining abused welfare systems of today I assure you he would have never started them.
 
No company is there for the pure enrichment and enjoyment of the worker. It's first order of business is to SURVIVE.

After that a company must work for BALANCE between employees, investors, and customers.

When a company declares bankruptcy, it's very survival is at stake. (Does everyone get that?)


A company that give all their workers everything they want is doomed to failure. Seriously.

If anyone believes a company complete exists only for workers . . . well, that's a very socialist view. And socialism isn't very American.
A company that has happy workers has productive workers, and more offen than not a profitable and ever-expanding business. Case in point; Southwest Airlines, who is the most unionized and profitable carrier flying today. For the most part, SWA takes care of their people, and it shows every quarter.

Now, if you want to look at a number of carriers that continously made management blunders while crapping on the employees, of whom are expected to pay for these management mistakes, look no further than TWA, Eastern Airlines, United Airlines, American Airlines, Northwest Airlines, Delta, and US Airways. These current and former management teams have continuously made foolish, greedy, inept business decisions while enriching themselves off the backs of the frontline employees.

When it comes time for the inevitable slide into bankruptcy, the employees of these disfunctional or now defunct carriers are supposed to "buck up" and accept whatever comes their way because they are: "Just lucky to have a job" and should be thankful for the scraps that are thrown their way.

Are we to just accept the fact that robber barron type corporate criminals like Carl Icaan, Frank Lorenso, Doug Steenland, Don Carty and a host of others are just the way it is in the airline world??? I think not.

Most of us that have a spine feel that Chapter 7 liquidation should be the result of these failures as we no longer are willing to finance what will most likely be a fatal result in the long run anyway. If they can't run a business in a just and correct manner, than it will die as it should. The persistant failure of the non-existant business plans or the business plan of hiding behind a bankruptcy judge to void union contracts, pensions, and paying creditors is wrong. This while the corporate elite float away with millions? NO MORE!!!!

Let the business die a Chapter 7 liquidation death, as those of us are sick and tired of giving in to the coporate greed "more is not enough" mentality while the workers that helped build the company suffer. No worker wants to see its employer fail, but at some point you must draw the line.

I am not willing to give another dime. Seriously. Do you get it????

:angry: :angry: :angry: :angry:
 
Well Big E that is indeed a comment. If FDR knew that his social programs were going to turn into the money draining abused welfare systems of today I assure you he would have never started them.

OMG....PTO is now speaking for FDR as well? Just how can you assure us he wouldnt have started them? Have you discussed this topic with him or is that just your opinion? If it is your opinion you can not assure us because you dont know. Please tell us all how you met FDR and can assure us of this PTO. The only thing you know about FDR is what you have had read to you from history books and everything I have read about him i have never once seen he state what you say you can assure us. Are you have seance's in your lonely hotel room at night PTO.

The stupidity of your posts provides hours of entertainment for my wife and i PTO.
 
Come on DEAD BIRD, If you have read anything on the subject you would know his programs were work programs and designed to bring the US out of the depression. We will never know if they actually would have because World War II did it for him. The point here is that they were work programs not sit at home and increase your welfare check with more kids programs. You know, something for nothing just the way your unions set things up for its members.
 
assure: To inform positively, as to remove doubt

So please tell me again how you can assure us PukeTO? It is a simple question for a simple person.
 
Because, DEAD BIRD, the man was a man of action not laziness. Anyone that knows anything about the man will tell you the same thing. Try a little "research" and you will discover the same. I am not going to sit here and give you a high school class or a freshman year political science class. Get a life DEAD BIRD.
 
PukeTO... this is just another example of how inaccurate your posts are. You state your opinions like they are facts when they arent. You cant assure us that FDR would do this or do that, it is only your opinion. So like all your other posts instead of stating it is my opinion you try to project that you have direct knowledge of a situation when in fact you have none. Just more BS coming out of the mouth of SCUM which you are.
 
Since my opinions have been correct through out this whole ordeal I suggest you pay attention to them. I "assure" you they are better than your facts.
 

Similar threads

Latest posts

Back
Top