On the US Airways web-site, along side of America West, "Joining Together to Create the World's Largest Low-fare Aireline." Here are some of the roundtrip "low fares" (lowest fares) offered out of CLT (same as before the merger):
CLT - CHS = $467
CLT - ILM = $480 (Tuesday and Wednesday only)
CLT - ILM = $543 (other days)
CLT - RDU = $423 (Tuesday and Wednesday only)
CLT - RDU = $480 (other days)
CLT - ROA = $317
CLT - RIC = $389 (Tuesday and Wednesday only)
CLT - RIC = $440 (other days)
CLT - ORF = $483
CLT - BDL = $419
Now, lets examine cities where there are low fare carriers flying the same routes:
CLT - ATL = $188
CLT - SAV = $228
CLT - JAX = $188
CLT - TPA = $228
CLT - MIA = $178
CLT - DFW = $298
CLT - LAX = $318
CLT - SFO = $318
CLT - MDW = $273
CLT - BOS = $138
CLT - LGA = $342
CLT - DCA = $138
If you look at the America West website, you will find it hard to find a fare from PHX or LAS that is that of a low fare carrier unless WN is also flying the same route. In other words, to say that you are the largest LOW FARE carrier is false advertising and misrepsentation. I may be wrong, but I do not see U lowering any fares until a true low fare carrier enters the market. Unless they do, you will continue to see CLT as a connection hub and RDU a growing O&D market.
I'm sure someone will be quick to say that WN and the other low fare carriers can not take you to LGW or FRA. So what! I have lived in CLT going on 5 years now and have yet to fly U since moving to the area. Prior to moving to CLT, I gave U most of my air travel business. I travel domestic and international, business and leisure, and I have not suffered any by not flying U from CLT.
I'm sure that someone will also be quick to say that the HIGH fares in the first set of cities is due to demand. If that is the case, why are the majority of those cities going from mainline to express between them and CLT?
Hopefully someone in the "new" U will see the money flowing to other carriers in other cities before it is too late.