Michael Savage "says"......

[delldude]

I am shocked. I thought he had all but ranted himself into oblivion. Is he still the same ole' Savage?

Chi-town

 

[delldude]

Anyone who yells and screams and calls people names is an angry person in my book.

Its his show....I guess he can do what he wants.

He has some very good points on America and our idiots in DC and local too.

 

[Gilding the Lily]

Chi-town

Shucks! It conflicts with my two favorite programs on Chicago Public Radio.

 

[777 fixer]

Its his show....I guess he can do what he wants.

He has some very good points on America and our idiots in DC and local too.

The fact that's its his show does not change my opinion of him.

 

[Gilding the Lily]

He has some very good points on America and our idiots in DC and local too.

A broken watch is right twice a day. Does that make it any less useless?

*** I have a limited knowledge of Savage and base my entire opinion on the relatively few minutes I have heard a Savage production. Those few minutes were enough for me to ignore/discredit his opinion. With that said, I would not have enough information to suggest to someone else that he should be ignored.

 

[NewHampshire Black Bears]

A broken watch is right twice a day. Does that make it any less useless?

*** I have a limited knowledge of Savage and base my entire opinion on the relatively few minutes I have heard a Savage production. Those few minutes were enough for me to ignore/discredit his opinion. With that said, I would not have enough information to suggest to someone else that he should be ignored.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


Lily,

Curious to know you opinion of Limbaugh/Hannity ??

 

[Gilding the Lily]

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


Lily,

Curious to know you opinion of Limbaugh/Hannity ??

I don't listen -- or watch -- either. I have fond memories of occasionally turning on Rush in the first gulf war; however, I find (as with most polarizing talk show hosts) that his passion towards his cause may occasionally lead to disinformation (a passion for other things may lead to disinformation, or perhaps "cloudy" judgment). He is far less annoying to me than many others in a similar "genre." I wouldn't mind having dinner with the fellow under the condition that he wouldn't have to say anything in order to sell a book or radio advertisement.

I am not fond of Hannity. It is all dualism with him... except he only picks and chooses what fits his made up mind, rather than looking with objectivity first. *** I admit to not spending much time listening or watching Hannity because everything but his voice annoys me. I base most of this off of his books. (Speaking of his books, they were published by Murdoch I believe... another character that I am not fond of).

 

[UAL_TECH]

B) UT

 

[delldude]

A broken watch is right twice a day. Does that make it any less useless?

*** I have a limited knowledge of Savage and base my entire opinion on the relatively few minutes I have heard a Savage production. Those few minutes were enough for me to ignore/discredit his opinion. With that said, I would not have enough information to suggest to someone else that he should be ignored.

I don't agree with everything Savage says and yes he is quite a polarizing figure....but he makes very sound points on issues of the day. I don't follow any talk show regularly...usually I'll listen when in the car to work or the store.
For the most part,any of these people..its a point of view.They usually present objective information.

 

[NewHampshire Black Bears]

A fair WARNING to all you "coolers" !

It appears that I have the (DELL) DUDE on my side, with regard to Michael Savage , and THAT Combination could be(potentially) VERY DANGEROUS :bleh: :mf_boff:

😀 😀 😀