Kev3188
Veteran
COULD and DOES are two entirely different things.
Irrelevant.
You claimed that it DL couldn't get rid of "disgruntled" employees. I've pointed to explicit written company policy that states otherwise.
Then, thousands of words later, you mentioned that you hadn't looked at said policy.
That, to quote the inimitable Southwind, tells me all I need to know.
The fact that they are not the same is exactly why the representation elections have not been successful - and there has been enough time since the merger that if there really was a problem, it would surface and DL employees would respond.
Lots of things are surfacing across various workgroups. You can take my word for it or not.
DL employees have been involved in representation campaigns for years - and other than the pilots decades ago, no major group has not gained representation.
Nice double negative. Freudian slip?
Seriously, just because it hasn't happened before doesn't mean it won't in the future. The fallacy of the antecedent has been a recurring theme in this thread with you, but it's just that- a fallacy.
Again, your campaign of "they could" is not backed up by reality - which is why no one really sees it is a problem.
Well, if reality =/= written company policy, then okay. otherwise, see above.
BTW, who is "no one?"