What Kev hasn't said is that as a manager at DL, I had the responsibility to hire and fire and provide discipline when it was necessary to do so. Thus, I am dead accurate in knowing that DL has HR processes that are incredibly careful to protect employees and to ensure that there is indeed a due process given to all employees. The idea that Kevin wants to spread that DL employees are subject to immediate termination is simply wrong - and he wont begin to find an HRPM that covers the processes that managers must follow when an employee discipline issue is involved. Since Kevin continues to believe that a union is a necessity, I can only interpret his continued statements about the vulnerability of DL employees at the hands of DL mgmt within his value system which says that big corporations and workers are in constant conflict and that the only recourse for workers is a large organization of their own to protect them.
All of that is lovely.
None of it overrides the one sentence on the first page of the HRPM that trumps it all. I'll also remind you that it is "construed" under Georgia state law- one of 4 states that doesn't observe any of the 3 major exceptions to the at will doctrine. But as someone who hired and fired, you already knew that, right?
Can you still access the manual? Go look at the terms of employment, and tell us what it says.
And, yes, I do ask PMNW people what they think about working for DL etc. And the vast majority of people are saying that although things are different than they were with NW, they see that DL gets to the same result using different methods and they are as comfortable or more so with their employer.
Wait. You yourself just noted that you couldn't tell who was who. Is asking what carrier they came from your opener?
Let's be honest for a minute. Do you honestly think that an agent working a flight is going to tell you the "whole truth" about what's going on? For one, they're busy. Second, for all they know, you may be one of the "secret flyers" (or whatever they're now called) that get rewarded for reporting things back to the company. And third, they may just not want to talk to a total stranger (NRSA or not).
I and others raise the question of how you connect needles found in sandwiches to a question of DL's service
I didn't. That would be you who brought the idea disgruntled employees into the mix. I merely followed the direction the thread took.
when we see DL employees working well, integrated and with PMNW employees not seeking to return to what they once knew while at the same time you seem to want to hold onto a world that no longer exists and fewer and fewer people value.
Remind us how you know that many PMNW aren't seeking to return to representation (or PMDL, for that matter). You sure about that? Is a bit of chit-chat at the gate podium an accurate sampling of the workforce? Asked any rampers? How 'bout F/A's?
My desire is for you to recognize that your world has moved... so did the world of about 40K other PMNW employees. They seemed to make the turn; today would be a good day for you to do the same.
No. Today is a good day to work toward getting labor and capital on equal footing. Today is a good day to collectively value ourselves, and what we bring to the table. Today is a good day to fight for consistent application of policies and procedures systemwide.
Today is NOT a good day to shrug our shoulders, buy into the "we're just lucky to have a job" mindset, and slink off into the night. Today is NOT a good day to settle for the lowering of standards that your former employer seems to embrace. That may have worked for you; I'm betting the other way.