NEW twu 2006 LM2

[AMFAMAN]

Some interesting things on the new lm2...

(A)
KIRK WELLS

BIXBY
OK

ORGANIZING

Total of All Transactions $21,416

Name and Address
(A)
DAVID MOSES


HURST
TX

Total of All Transactions $69,242

RICK MULLINGS


CLAREMORE
OK


ORGANIZING

Total of All Transactions $21,752

A
B
C J LITTLE
PRESIDENT
$223,233

G YINGST
VP
$160,618

R GLESS
INT'L REP
$133,448

Of course this doesn't include the AA salary. :down:

http://erds.dol-esa.gov/query/getOrgQry.do
FILE NUMBER
000-218

 

[ch53D]

Kirk Wells gets $21,416 a year for representing the dead, retired, re-signed on the AA M & R eligibility list. It pays to be in the liars club (TWU/AA).

 

[eolesen]

David Moses used to be the IT guy for the ATD, right? If he's still doing that, he's probably one of the few on the list actually earning their pay. $70K for a web programmer/LAN technician is actually pretty cheap. AA ITS hires them in at $80K and up off the street.

 

[AMFAMAN]

David Moses used to be the IT guy for the ATD, right? If he's still doing that, he's probably one of the few on the list actually earning their pay. $70K for a web programmer/LAN technician is actually pretty cheap. AA ITS hires them in at $80K and up off the street.

Still is and he still shows in the headcount for DFW despite not being here for years. Some kind of greaseball deal is costing someone on layoff a job at DFW. :down:

Videtich is another that still shows on the headcount despite being at the Intl for 2 years. :down:

 

[Birdman]

There's something to be said about the lack of shared sacrifice by union officials. It's beyond me why the membership hasn't said it. BTW, D.B. made 100k in 06' and who knows what this year.

 

[Ken MacTiernan]

Some interesting things on the new lm2...
Of course this doesn't include the AA salary. :down:

http://erds.dol-esa.gov/query/getOrgQry.do
FILE NUMBER
000-218

And did ANY of these guys in the international take a pay & benefit cut like the AMTs at AA?

 

[nbmcg01]

Some interesting things on the new lm2...
Of course this doesn't include the AA salary. :down:

http://erds.dol-esa.gov/query/getOrgQry.do
FILE NUMBER
000-218

Much as I have a dislike of most AA unions and their cronies, the LM2s are not just salary. If a rep has gone on a trip (union business) the expenses are included in the LM2s. Any benefits that are paid ( if the Union has to reimburse AA) then those go into the LM2s. They have a very complicated formula that "can" make the reps compensation appear very high (especially if you question how much work that person produces..lol)

 

[Bob Owens]

Much as I have a dislike of most AA unions and their cronies, the LM2s are not just salary. If a rep has gone on a trip (union business) the expenses are included in the LM2s. Any benefits that are paid ( if the Union has to reimburse AA) then those go into the LM2s. They have a very complicated formula that "can" make the reps compensation appear very high (especially if you question how much work that person produces..lol)

Monies laid out by the union official get added, but normally if they travel a lot they are issued a union credit card so the International is billed directly, this does not show up on the LM-2.

The formula is not complicated at all. Checks written from the union to the officer are the only things reported, no expenses(unless they laid out the money), no company reimbursement for wages or benifits paid,just monies that went from the unions account to the official. There are seperate columns in the LM-2, the first one has the salary. There is nothing added to that. That only includes what the union pays, not what the company pays.So in the case of the TWU the salaries may be much, much higher than those reported on the LM-2.

For instance both Gary Yingst and Bobby Gless told members that when we took our massive paycuts in 2003 that their salaries were cut also. If you where to look at the LM-2s you would not see any cut, Yingst told a member that his cut was smaller, around 6%. Obviously if you take a 25% paycut on only a third of your total pay your total paycut would be less.The income these officials recieve from the company is not reported on the LM-2.

 

[TWU informer]

TRANSPORT WORKERS (TWU)

Philadelphia Local Chieftains Agree to File Disclosure Forms

Complying with Department of Labor (DOL) requirements for financial transparency doesn’t portend the return of slavery in this country after all. On January 8, following a nearly two-year holdout, Robert and David Taylor, respectively the president and treasurer of Transport Workers Union Local 700, representing parking garage attendants in Philadelphia, agreed in federal court to disclose their union’s revenues and expenditures. The consent decree stated that the union would be “permanently enjoined and restrained†from further failure to file its required annual LM-3 disclosure form. Local 700 had not filed reports for the years 2002-05. And this was no act of forgetfulness.



Union Corruption Update previously reported that the DOL on September 21 had filed a civil complaint against the union, demanding that the Taylors complete and submit all back reports. The department justifiably believed that it had run out of options. The local bosses had written a letter dated March 17, 2005 to Peter Papinchak, district director of the Labor Department’s Office of Labor-Management Standards, flatly indicating a refusal to comply. The Taylors called filing requirements “slavery,†and accused the Labor Department of “threats, duress and coercion.†Given the bizarre example recently set by Roger Toussaint, head of TWU Local 100 in New York City, such a move somehow seems appropriate. U.S. Attorney Patrick Meehan, for one, wasn’t impressed. “We cannot have rogue unions who believe they are above the law,†he said. The new agreement should put teeth into those words. (OLMS, 1/22/07; other sources).