Nmb Offers Binding Arbitration
- Thread starter eolesen
- Start date
Ken MacTiernan
Veteran
luv2fly said:
Why would the mechanics be screwed? If everyone supported the mechanics perhaps it would be management that would be screwed?
WorldTraveler
Corn Field
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2003
- Messages
- 21,709
- Reaction score
- 10,662
AP
Northwest Rejects Mechanics' Arbitration
Monday July 18, 8:16 pm ET
By Steve Karnowski, Associated Press Writer
Northwest Rejects Arbitration With Mechanics in Move That Could Lead to Strike
MINNEAPOLIS (AP) -- Northwest Airlines Corp. rejected binding arbitration with its mechanics' union on Monday, a move that could start a 30-day countdown toward a strike.
The airline said binding arbitration would take too long and would not lead to the labor cost savings it requires soon in negotiations with the Airline Mechanics Fraternal Association.
It will be up to the National Mediation Board to declare an impasse, which would start a 30-day "cooling off" period required before the mechanics could strike.
A spokeswoman for the board did not immediately return a phone call seeking comment.
"As we have consistently communicated, the company requires a minimum of $1.1 billion in total labor cost reductions -- with $176 million coming from AMFA-represented employees," Julie Hagen Showers, vice president for labor relations, wrote in a letter to the National Mediation Board. "Any process which may result in achieving less than the required savings leaves the airline at risk."
Hagen Showers said a deadline will help both sides reach an agreement.
Jeff Mathews, contract coordinator and spokesman for AMFA, said the union would have no comment Monday. A strike authorization vote by AMFA members began July 5 and was due to close at 10 a.m. EDT on Tuesday.
In a separate statement, Northwest said arbitration is not the correct course.
"The offer of binding arbitration relies on the notion that the best solution often lies somewhere between the positions of the two parties in the arbitration," the statement said. "In addition, the administrative process leading to arbitration tends to be lengthy. Northwest has no choice, it must achieve significant labor savings this year."
Eagan-based Northwest, the nation's fourth-largest carrier, says it has developed contingency plans that will allow it to fly its full schedule in the event of a strike.
While both sides have agreed that cost cuts are needed, they've also said their negotiations are deadlocked and have asked mediators to release them from the talks.
The $176 million Northwest is seeking from the mechanics would translate into a pay cut of roughly 25 percent. AMFA says Northwest also wants the right to outsource more maintenance work.
AMFA has offered temporary pay cuts it says would save $143.5 million. Northwest has countered that that offer is really worth only $87 million because it counts money saved from earlier layoffs.
Northwest has gotten a total of $300 million in annual labor cost savings from its pilots and managers, and is seeking $148 million from flight attendants.
Northwest Airlines: http://www.nwa.com
Aircraft Mechanics Fraternal Association: http://www.amfanatl.org
Northwest Rejects Mechanics' Arbitration
Monday July 18, 8:16 pm ET
By Steve Karnowski, Associated Press Writer
Northwest Rejects Arbitration With Mechanics in Move That Could Lead to Strike
MINNEAPOLIS (AP) -- Northwest Airlines Corp. rejected binding arbitration with its mechanics' union on Monday, a move that could start a 30-day countdown toward a strike.
The airline said binding arbitration would take too long and would not lead to the labor cost savings it requires soon in negotiations with the Airline Mechanics Fraternal Association.
It will be up to the National Mediation Board to declare an impasse, which would start a 30-day "cooling off" period required before the mechanics could strike.
A spokeswoman for the board did not immediately return a phone call seeking comment.
"As we have consistently communicated, the company requires a minimum of $1.1 billion in total labor cost reductions -- with $176 million coming from AMFA-represented employees," Julie Hagen Showers, vice president for labor relations, wrote in a letter to the National Mediation Board. "Any process which may result in achieving less than the required savings leaves the airline at risk."
Hagen Showers said a deadline will help both sides reach an agreement.
Jeff Mathews, contract coordinator and spokesman for AMFA, said the union would have no comment Monday. A strike authorization vote by AMFA members began July 5 and was due to close at 10 a.m. EDT on Tuesday.
In a separate statement, Northwest said arbitration is not the correct course.
"The offer of binding arbitration relies on the notion that the best solution often lies somewhere between the positions of the two parties in the arbitration," the statement said. "In addition, the administrative process leading to arbitration tends to be lengthy. Northwest has no choice, it must achieve significant labor savings this year."
Eagan-based Northwest, the nation's fourth-largest carrier, says it has developed contingency plans that will allow it to fly its full schedule in the event of a strike.
While both sides have agreed that cost cuts are needed, they've also said their negotiations are deadlocked and have asked mediators to release them from the talks.
The $176 million Northwest is seeking from the mechanics would translate into a pay cut of roughly 25 percent. AMFA says Northwest also wants the right to outsource more maintenance work.
AMFA has offered temporary pay cuts it says would save $143.5 million. Northwest has countered that that offer is really worth only $87 million because it counts money saved from earlier layoffs.
Northwest has gotten a total of $300 million in annual labor cost savings from its pilots and managers, and is seeking $148 million from flight attendants.
Northwest Airlines: http://www.nwa.com
Aircraft Mechanics Fraternal Association: http://www.amfanatl.org
luv2fly
Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2002
- Messages
- 1,187
- Reaction score
- 0
Ken MacTiernan said:
They are screwed from the standpoint that they are going to strike during a anti-labor administration. The threat of a strike is normally a tool reserved for labor, and that is why I find it peculiar that it is NW management that is so eager to get to the end of a cooling off period.With scabs in place, and a favorable administration, it is obvious NW believes it can do much better than what the mechanics have offered. IMO, the AMFA will call for a strike, and Bush will call for a PEB.
luv2fly said:
Heres the question then, with everyone stating there is too much capacity in the system, why would a PEB be in order? Are there any "sections" of the country that would be entirely without air service should this occur? You'd also have to consider if NW Airlink would be included in any stoppage since they serve the smaller markets, but as far as NW mainline planes, what cities or "sections" of the country would be without service and why would a PEB be in order?
The President may create an emergency board to investigate and report on a dispute over the terms of a collective bargaining agreement. Under the Railway Labor Act, the President may exercise his discretion to create an emergency board when the labor dispute threatens "substantially to interrupt interstate commerce to a degree such as to deprive any section of the country of essential transportation service."
tadjr said:
Just a couple of points to consider:
1) Bush did impose a PEB on AMFA and NWA in their previous negotiations in 2001. The only difference is that now it is NWA that wants the strike.
2) The Secretary of Labor is a former member of the NWA board of directors.
cltbay1homie
Advanced
NWA/AMT said:
say it aint so...GDumbYA would not have done that...HEEEEHEEEE. stand by folks...looks like a lot of scabs are about to retain and aquire some senority.
I only hope that those with some level of morals just quit, and tell GW to stick it up his *** if it comes to it.
as always...this is just my opinion...take it or leave it....but if you put a little mustache on GW...does he not look like Adolf....and I dont mean Coors.
