boeing787 said:It will go over $60 by early summer.
[post="260093"][/post]

jimntx said:So, the next time you're at the pump, be glad your car doesn't run on water, Scope, or Whiteout, or God forbid, Pepto Bismol or Nyquil.
[post="260110"][/post]
Care to list these MOST analists?usfliboi said:Most anaylist see prices stablizing and most agree its at its peak. Time will tell!
[post="260125"][/post]
WASHINGTON -- Oil prices rallied to a record close above $57 US a barrel yesterday, sparked by a surge in gasoline futures that could send the average retail cost of gasoline above $2.25 a gallon in the United States within a few weeks. Analysts said the nearly $2-a-barrel runup in oil prices suggested there is new money coming into the market from hedge funds and other speculators, as well as from commercial players, such as airlines and fuel distributors, that are trying to lock in prices now out of fear the upward trend may continueusfliboi said:Most anaylist see prices stablizing and most agree its at its peak. Time will tell!
[post="260125"][/post]
usfliboi said:Most anaylist see prices stablizing and most agree its at its peak. Time will tell!
[post="260125"][/post]
Another factor appeared to be an investment bank report that said strong demand and tight supplies could cause a "super spike" that will push oil prices above $100 a barrel.
Oil analyst Marshall Steeves of Refco Group Inc. in New York said the rally in fuel prices is "overdone."
"I don't think the sky's the limit," Steeves said. "At some point, there'll be some impact on demand. But where that price is, is hard to determine."
BoeingBoy said:Here's what passes for the definitive word on fare increases vs fuel prices:
Lakefield said yesterday in a message to employees that results for March and early summer will be better than February, when US Airways lost $119 million, but the recent fare increases -- "a dollar here, five dollars there" -- do not come close to covering the record increases in fuel prices.
US Airways Watch
Jim
[post="260106"][/post]
Well, there's that brilliant analyst USA320pilot, and that's all that flyboi needs to know.FA Mikey said:Care to list these MOST analists?
[post="260132"][/post]

Busdrvr said:Just to be a little bit of a contrarian...
In the medium term, higher fuel prices may very well help U and UAL.
First, one must come to a conclusion regarding prices and ticket demand. CAL's Mar numbers suggest what I've been saying all along, the price elasticity of demand for an individual airline is VERY elastic, while for the industry it is very inelastic. CAL has reported an INCREASE in demand YOY at HIGHER yields. We'll all likely see similar results.
The game theory explanation of what's going on would take about three pages of writting, but I'll summerize. In the past, without the extremely high oil prices, it was benefitual for one airline to not follow the fare increases. They actually maximized revenue by hanging back. This had the added dimension of being a "short term" strategy due to the hope that they could make UAL and U "go away". Now, the math has changed, the optimal solution in the short term as well as long term is to follow along. Hopefully this will continue to a level that will result fares that actually cover costs.
Another thing to remember, who of all the majors have the most fuel efficient fleets? (I'll give a hint, they start with U)
[post="260143"][/post]