Oklahoma and Satan

[Ms Tree]

Perhaps you should read some of the case law on the issue.  I do not think the results are what you want them to be.  The courts have forced the removal of religious symbols all over the country.  
 
This case has nothing to do with the removal of the 10 commandments although I believe that is what will happen because people like you have no interest in allowing equal access to public lands and you have no interest in treating all beliefs equally.  
 
This case is about having another religious symbol on public property which as an advocate of the 1st I would think you would be in favor of.  Imagine my surprise that you are not.
 
You can display your symbolism where ever and when ever you want so long as it is on private property.  When it is on public property where I pay taxes then you do not have that right because the 1st does not mean what you want it to mean.  
 
You can pretend there is a war on Christians all you want.  The tide is turning and fewer and fewer people seem to care about your persecution complex.

 

[southwind]

Are they White and Southern?

Wow ! You and Barry-O sure are scared of White Southerners !
 
Speakin' of Barry-O.....he git banned again?

 

[NewHampshire Black Bears]

Who is we? Are you a satanist, or an Oklahoman, religious zealot, or all three?

 
NO, just a POLE SMOKER  !!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Dog Wonder]

You and Barry-O sure are scared of White Southerners !

They make us laugh until our sides hurt.

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

Perhaps you should read some of the case law on the issue.  I do not think the results are what you want them to be.  The courts have forced the removal of religious symbols all over the country.  
 
This case has nothing to do with the removal of the 10 commandments although I believe that is what will happen because people like you have no interest in allowing equal access to public lands and you have no interest in treating all beliefs equally.  
 
This case is about having another religious symbol on public property which as an advocate of the 1st I would think you would be in favor of.  Imagine my surprise that you are not.
 
You can display your symbolism where ever and when ever you want so long as it is on private property.  When it is on public property where I pay taxes then you do not have that right because the 1st does not mean what you want it to mean.  
 
You can pretend there is a war on Christians all you want.  The tide is turning and fewer and fewer people seem to care about your persecution complex.

No offense but your lack of coherency in the past has ruined your credibility with me. You act like your an expert in everything yet, when pushed, you flip flop like the left you love so much.   

 

[delldude]

Perhaps you should read some of the case law on the issue.  I do not think the results are what you want them to be.  The courts have forced the removal of religious symbols all over the country.  
 
This case has nothing to do with the removal of the 10 commandments although I believe that is what will happen because people like you have no interest in allowing equal access to public lands and you have no interest in treating all beliefs equally.  
 
This case is about having another religious symbol on public property which as an advocate of the 1st I would think you would be in favor of.  Imagine my surprise that you are not.
 
You can display your symbolism where ever and when ever you want so long as it is on private property.  When it is on public property where I pay taxes then you do not have that right because the 1st does not mean what you want it to mean.  
 
You can pretend there is a war on Christians all you want.  The tide is turning and fewer and fewer people seem to care about your persecution complex.

 
Yeah because they were decided by liberal courts who perverted the original law.

 

[Knotbuyinit]

No offense but your lack of coherency in the past has ruined your credibility with me. You act like your an expert in everything yet, when pushed, you flip flop like the left you love so much.   

Ms Tree suffers from the Dunning-Kruger effect, from which there is no cure. It's a cognitive bias in which unskilled individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly rating their ability much higher than is accurate. This bias is attributed to a metacognite inability of the unskilled to recognize their ineptitude.

 

[Ms Tree]

I think it is hilarious that the three of you clowns cannot even address the issue with out trying to insult me. The conservative zealots have been blind sided with their own ignorance which the three of seem to buy into.

 

[Knotbuyinit]

I think it is hilarious that the three of you clowns cannot even address the issue with out trying to insult me. The conservative zealots have been blind sided with their own ignorance which the three of seem to buy into.

 
What's hilarious is you calling us clowns then complaining about our insults!   

 

[Ms Tree]

Still incapable of addressing the issue.  You insult me I'll toss it right back at you.

 

[Knotbuyinit]

Still incapable of addressing the issue.  You insult me I'll toss it right back at you.

 
No, I'm very sure I'm capable of addressing issues that concern me.
 
I'm not concerned about a satanic monument being erected in Oklahoma nor am I concerned about your insults. 

 

[Ms Tree]

 
No, I'm very sure I'm capable of addressing issues that concern me.
 
I'm not concerned about a satanic monument being erected in Oklahoma nor am I concerned about your insults. 

And yet you feel compelled to post and insult me. 
 
It does not surprise me in the least that you are not concerned or have an opinion on a freedom of religion issue that does not directly affect your rights.  Not like the COTUS means jack to you.

 

[Knotbuyinit]

And yet you feel compelled to post and insult me. 
 
It does not surprise me in the least that you are not concerned or have an opinion on a freedom of religion issue that does not directly affect your rights.  Not like the COTUS means jack to you.

 
LOL, you go girl!

 

[southwind]

 
NO, just a POLE SMOKER  !!!!!!!!!!!!!

So you been out smokin' poles instead of spending quality time here?
 

They make us laugh until our sides hurt.

again..............ZZZzzzz...........your sh!ts getting old !

 

[traderjake]

What case and case for what?

 

BaRack doesn't follow the constitution.........why should we?

 
 

 
You would have thought someone would have brought a case before a court or something. I am guessing that this is just another one of your unsubstantiated opinions or do you actually have any case law to back up your opinion?

 
Friday, the United States Court of Appeals brought the president back to Earth and reminded him that that the Constitution's Appointments Clause and the U.S. Senate are very much part of reality by voiding three of Obama's recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board.
 
http://realclearpoli...you_300615.html