He's a consultant that spends everyday talking about them.Anyone know who Mike Boyd is and if he ever spent one day working with an airline?
Why does he get so much press time? Is he the only airline analyst on the planet? I've noticed that analyst's never appear that they have worked in the field in which they spew opinions about!
USAirways did in fact die. It was handed to AWA with the gas tank empty and the keys in the ignition.He's a consultant that spends everyday talking about them.
I remember him declaring US Airways 'done' a long time ago. He's more often wrong than he is right.
He said they were done due to the Christmas Meltdown. It was eventually sold to HP, but that wasn't anywhere close to his prediction.USAirways did in fact die. It was handed to AWA with the gas tank empty and the keys in the ignition.
lol it seems as if some people let facts get in their way - airbus and ac along with evergreen funded both airlines to merge. However why are people talking about US on the UAL forum, amazing how if you lose a little weight you become popular again.. lolHe said they were done due to the Christmas Meltdown. It was eventually sold to HP, but that wasn't anywhere close to his prediction.
I'm sorry! What 'fact' did I get wrong?lol it seems as if some people let facts get in their way - airbus and ac along with evergreen funded both airlines to merge. However why are people talking about US on the UAL forum, amazing how if you lose a little weight you become popular again.. lol
Maybe the fact that U was not "sold" to a west....They were both handed a pot of money to effect a merger...The pot of money came from "outside investors"! Not A west...I'm sorry! What 'fact' did I get wrong?
Dude, it was sold and 90% of the current management was booted.Maybe the fact that U was not "sold" to a west....They were both handed a pot of money to effect a merger...The pot of money came from "outside investors"! Not A west...
Dude, it was sold and 90% of the current management was booted.
US Airways tried to stand on it's own, but it failed several times with several different management teams.
The outside money was given to a new management team in the hopes they could do better.
You can call it a merger if it makes you sleep better at night, but that's just a slipcover for the underlying transaction. U was clearly the larger of the two entities. If it were REALLY a merger, HQ would have remained at CCY.
sold, sold, sold.
Maybe the fact that U was not "sold" to a west....They were both handed a pot of money to effect a merger...The pot of money came from "outside investors"! Not A west...