RNC fires phone solicitor's over Immigration Bill

[delldude]

Story

Just two days after President Bush slammed critics of his immigration policy, the Republican National Committee has reportedly fired all 65 of its telephone solicitors, as donors are said to be furious over the Bush's stance to give legal status to millions of illegal aliens.

This makes alot of sense.. :blink:

Maybe its another political firing...must have been Dem's

 

[local 12 proud]

"We write these comments up from each call, and give them to a supervisor who passes them on to the finance director or the national chairman," he said. "But when I talked with the White House, the people there told me they got nothing but positive comments on the president's immigration stand."

A Rasmussen poll last week showed only 26 percent of American voters favor the Senate plan.

The public is most passionate about enforcement, the survey indicated. About 72 percent of voters said it's "very important" for "the government to improve its enforcement of the borders and reduce illegal immigration."

The figure jumped to 89 percent among Republicans, while 65 percent of Democrats and 63 percent of unaffiliated voters believed enforcement is "very important."

What part of NO don't they understand? :huh:

 

[NewHampshire Black Bears]

(Talk about the .."Gang(political party) that could'nt shoot straight") :blink: :blink: :blink:

I ALWAYS will remember the following;

The "BABE RUTH" of the Republican party was Ronald Wilson Reagan(I DOUBT seriously if I'll get any arguments over that statement) !!

In 1986...RwR..Gave AMNESTY to a #### load of Mexicans.
(How am I doing so far Local 12 Proud) ????

So along comes ...The Banana eating, CHIMPANZEE faced..little TURD, ...and he try's to do the SAME THING, and the CONSERVATIVES are "all over DUMBYA'S ####"


I swear, I'll NEVER understand the "GRAND OL' PARTY" !!!

NH/BB's

 

[local 12 proud]

(Talk about the .."Gang(political party) that could'nt shoot straight") :blink: :blink: :blink:

I ALWAYS will remember the following;

The "BABE RUTH" of the Republican party was Ronald Wilson Reagan(I DOUBT seriously if I'll get any arguments over that statement) !!

In 1986...RwR..Gave AMNESTY to a #### load of Mexicans.
(How am I doing so far Local 12 Proud) ????

So along comes ...The Banana eating, CHIMPANZEE faced..little TURD, ...and he try's to do the SAME THING, and the CONSERVATIVES are "all over DUMBYA'S ####"
I swear, I'll NEVER understand the "GRAND OL' PARTY" !!!

NH/BB's

Reagan did, in fact, sign the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986. And, in case you didn’t notice, the bill didn’t exactly do what Reagan thought it would. “The 1986 act did not solve our illegal immigration problem,†Reagan’s attorney general Ed Meese acknowledged in the New York Times last year — for the benefit of the blind, I guess.

The difference is that President Reagan called this what it was: amnesty. Indeed, look up the term “amnesty†in Black’s Law Dictionary, and you’ll find it says, “the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act provided amnesty for undocumented aliens already in the country.â€

Like the amnesty bill of 1986, the current Senate proposal would place those who have resided illegally in the United States on a path to citizenship, provided they meet a similar set of conditions and pay a fine and back taxes. The illegal immigrant does not go to the back of the line but gets immediate legalized status, while law-abiding applicants wait in their home countries for years to even get here. And that’s the line that counts. In the end, slight differences in process do not change the overriding fact that the 1986 law and today’s bill are both amnesties.

Twenty-one years later, Washington debates another immigration bill. Meese’s colleague Brian Darling, the Heritage Foundation’s director of Senate relations, warns: “This compromise is much more harmful for America than the ’86 amnesty. The Z-Visa and pathway to citizenship contain minimal fees and fines that don’t change the fact that this is a 1986 style Amnesty. The triggers new deportable offenses and border security are window dressing for the massive Amnesty Z visas. This is the 1986 Amnesty all over again on a massive scale.â€

What would Reagan do? For a start, he’d probably look to history, and avoid making the same miscalculation twice.

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=Mzg5M...WM2MDBkMjQ2Zjk=

Hey I have an Idea, lets enforce the Laws on the books before we pass more Laws! 😉

 

[NewHampshire Black Bears]

What a PERFECT name for someone working at the(RIGHT wing NUT)..Heritage foundation.....Brian "DARLING" :blink:

NH/BB's

 

[local 12 proud]

What a PERFECT name for someone working at the(RIGHT wing NUT)..Heritage foundation.....Brian "DARLING" :blink:

NH/BB's

What you afraid of picking lettuce?