What's new

Sen. Menendez and his underage prostitutes

eolesen

Veteran
Joined
Jul 23, 2003
Messages
15,959
Reaction score
9,375
Maybe Bob Menendez can share a cell with Jared Fogle? Oh, wait. He hasn't been charged, and probably won't.
 
Allegations of human trafficking and underage prostitution must be taken seriously and cannot be dismissed merely because the alleged perpetrator is a United States Senator.
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/08/24/feds-say-corroborating-evidence-backed-menendez-prostitution-claims

http://dailycaller.com/2015/08/24/doj-underage-prostitution-allegations-against-robert-menendez-backed-by-corroborating-evidence
 
If that crap is true he should be hung up by his nuts. What makes a person that sick and twisted and why do they think they will get away with it? They are a.oubkic figure. People will find out.

Freaking idiot.
 
No idea. This is the first I've heard of it. I wonder how.long it's been going on. My guess is a while and it took them a while to get a case together.
 
Old news with new claims. If he is guilty, then indict, prosecute, and move on.

The guy has smelled dirty for a long time.

People are people unless they are in the public trust. They are then held to a different standard of conduct.

There are threads dedicated to this already. Are you trying to outdo the bears now E?
 
He is trying to divert attention away from the thread where he thinks Carter screwed the hostages which he got released but Reagan did good because he gave arms to Iran and did no get hostages out but Iran was going to be scared to negotiate with Reagan .... does not make sense to me either.
 
Nah, I'd forgotten we discussed Menendez before. If you're that concerned, ask the mods to merge the threads.

But, I'm also not a big fan of digging up threads that are a year old, or having threads go on for 8-10 pages where they just become circular arguments, only to have people start quoting things from months/years past.
 
If...RM, ....Or ANYBODY ELSE for that matter, is convicted ... BEYOND a REASONABLE DOUBT,.....then, and only then  is that person Guilty.
 
It's NOT rocket science folks.     " Should a'...Could a'....Would a'.......doesn't  Count "  Helll, EVEN  'southwind knows  that  !
 
NewHampshire Black Bears said:
If...RM, ....Or ANYBODY ELSE for that matter, is convicted ... BEYOND a REASONABLE DOUBT,.....then, and only then  is that person Guilty.
So, by that matter, isn't Josh Duggar innocent? He's never even been charged, much less found guilty (unless you consider conviction by the Court of Public Shaming).

Neither Dennis Hastert, Mark Foley, John Ensign or John Edwards were convicted, and they're still treated as criminals, no?
 
Ms Tree said:
I thought Dugar admitted what he did.
That may be, but in Bear's myopic world, since he wasn't charged or convicted, he's not guilty.
 
Pretty sure in his world even an admission of guilt passes for guilt.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top