" STRIKE THREE " ( ATL ), YOU'RE O U T !!!

OP
N
Aug 20, 2002
9,917
671
www.usaviation.com
Dude, Biden won, get over it.

BrilliantDeepHorsefly-max-1mb.gif


DAMM Right JB WON. The Country was sick and tired of the "O-T", ORANGE TURD, who-by-the-way will NEVER SEE 1600' Pennsylvania AV again, unless he takes a F TOUR !
 

robbedagain

Veteran
Oct 13, 2003
11,120
2,688
Visit site
Still not enough to overturn. Now Fla n Arz have legal issues facing their new vote laws. Unbelievable how a group or sorry losers keep creating laws for voters when its been irrefutable proof no amount of fraud to overturn it existed. The far righties never came up with real actual proof of voter fraud that would change outcome despite rushing a republican judge to SCOTUS in hopes that the high court wld rule different.
 

eolesen

Veteran
Jul 23, 2003
15,316
9,221
Irrefutable proof would mean that it actually was litigated and investigated. So far, not a single court case proceeded, mainly over standing which is a judge's way out when they don't want to get involved in something. The AZ audit is the first actual investigation and audit. Everything else has been a recount, which doesn't go into any forensics.

But... in the process of staying out of the election results, the Federal courts including SCOTUS have reaffirmed state legislatures are empowered to set the times, places and manner of congressional elections. That's why Nancy and Chucky are so hell-bent on getting HR-1 pushed thru -- they want to take away power that the Constitution already assigned to the States, but I don't think it will work, nor will it appear to pass the Senate.

As for all the new laws... wait and see how those challenges proceed. At the surface, the most recent laws passed seem to be staying within the bounds of what's already become settled case law. Voter ID is here to stay thanks to the Courts. Determining the days and hours of early voting and parameters for mail-in/absentee ballots was always clearly with the State Legislatures to define.
 

delldude

Veteran
Oct 29, 2002
28,164
5,866
Downrange
www.youtube.com
Irrefutable proof would mean that it actually was litigated and investigated. So far, not a single court case proceeded, mainly over standing which is a judge's way out when they don't want to get involved in something. The AZ audit is the first actual investigation and audit. Everything else has been a recount, which doesn't go into any forensics.

But... in the process of staying out of the election results, the Federal courts including SCOTUS have reaffirmed state legislatures are empowered to set the times, places and manner of congressional elections. That's why Nancy and Chucky are so hell-bent on getting HR-1 pushed thru -- they want to take away power that the Constitution already assigned to the States, but I don't think it will work, nor will it appear to pass the Senate.

As for all the new laws... wait and see how those challenges proceed. At the surface, the most recent laws passed seem to be staying within the bounds of what's already become settled case law. Voter ID is here to stay thanks to the Courts. Determining the days and hours of early voting and parameters for mail-in/absentee ballots was always clearly with the State Legislatures to define.
Funny thing about the left screaming bloody murder over these recently passed state election laws....no one told them the Georgia law had provisions that were copied from existing NY State election law, and, what the other states that have recently passed , that the media claiming are restrictive, they fail to look at election law in Biden's home state.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Seatacus