What's new

The IAM

It's a good thing Edwards made all that money making insurance companies live up to their obligations. Corporations are scared of him (that's why the corporate media doesn't cover him - even Chris Matthews admitted it) and sell-out unions won't endorse him. In 2004, IAM endorsed Kerry, who advocated US going under, rather than Edwards.

The easiest thing for him to do would be to kick back and spend time with Elizabeth. But he has the desire and his own $$$ to campaign.

If y'all will remember, the guy who created the modern middle class and saved capitalism from itself was rich, too.


What's the problem?

$400 haircuts got a lot of media play. Howzabout this:

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Mitt_Romney_...2K_on_0719.html

Bias, anyone?

Just figures, Dio, you and I are of the same mind. Read these posts. I am an Edwards supporter, too.

You are the best!!!

Regards,
 
Just figures, Dio, you and I are of the same mind. Read these posts. I am an Edwards supporter, too.

You are the best!!!

Regards,


I wouldn't mind Edwards. Once he actually started trying to outline some of his agenda, the economists and think-tanks from both sides of the aisle would bombard him with the raw numbers and ramifications of such an agenda. He is a smart enough fellow; once he received such info and realized that some policies would actually hurt other portions of his agenda, he would turn from any errant ways.
 
Back
Top