What's new

The Race

boxer

Veteran
Joined
Feb 28, 2003
Messages
979
Reaction score
45
Location
SFO
A Legacy Airline and an LCC decided to have a canoe race on the Mississippi River. Both teams practiced long and hard to reach their peak performance before the race. On the big day the LCC won by a mile.

Afterward, the Legacy team became very discouraged and morally depressed. The Legacy management decided the reason for the crushing defeat had to be found. A Management Team made up of senior management was formed to investigate and recommend appropriate action.

Their conclusion was the LCC had 8 people rowing and 1 person steering, while the Legacy team had 8 people steering and one person rowing. So Legacy management hired a consulting company and paid them an incredible amount of money.

After six months of hard work, they advised that too many people were steering the boat, while not enough people were rowing. So the Legacy team acted: To prevent losing to the LCC again next year, the rowing team's management structure was totally reorganized to 4 steering supervisors, 3 area steering superintendents and 1 assistant superintendent steering manager.

They also implemented a new performance system that would give the 1 person rowing the boat greater incentive to work harder. It was called the Rowing Team Quality First Program, with meetings, dinners and free pens for the rower. Even new paddles and medical benefit incentives were promised for a winner. We must give the rower the empowerment and enrichments through this quality program.

The next year the LCC won by two miles.  Humiliated, the Legacy management laid off the rower for poor performance, halted development of a new canoe, sold the paddles and canceled all capital investments for new equipment.

The money saved was distributed to the senior executives as bonuses for a job well done.
 
that's just a little bit of an overstatement. several legacy carriers are running efficient operations that are becoming even more efficient. I think AA and DL should be commended for their efforts to become more productive. Sadly, many employees think that asking them to work harder is the problem when that is exactly what is needed. I don't know how the entire management organization has been changed but a number of carriers do have substantially fewer VPs than they had just a year ago.
 
WorldTraveler, I believe the vast majority of "employees" have no problem with working hard,

The "problem" begins when management requires labor to participate in HUGE pay and benefit cuts,

Then these same management personell turn around and reward themselves with Bonuses [off the employees back] for a job well done ?
 
I agree with you, insp. I am convinced that AA, CO, and DL have done a very good job of communicating their transformation plans to their employees and have a fairly well engaged workforce to turn the company around. DL is not as far along the process as AA is because of the 2 yr headstart they've had or w/ CO who really is just using the employee-management philosophy that Delta used up until the early 90s and then lost for over a decade but is now recovering. Employees can never be considered the whole problem or the whole answer - for good or bad.
 
Box...

I think that is a funny story......
 
LD3 said:
Box...

I think that is a funny story......
[post="278014"][/post]​
<_< Heard it before!!! But it is as true today, as when I first heard it when TWA was still flying!!!! 😉
 

Latest posts

Back
Top