What's new
By:

This should improve Hillary's chances in 2016...

The attack in Benghazi had nothing to do with a democrat war on women.  The abduction of the Nigerian girls has nothing to do with any supposed war on women in the US.  
 
The war on women is a republican thing.  The 20 pt trouncing that Romney lost by in 2012 is proof of that.  Keep saying that it's the democrats who have the war though.  I am sure some republicans will actually believe it.  Independents and liberals .. not so much.
 
Learn to read the topic.. it's about Hillary's capability to be a leader.

The lapses which resulted in both Benghazi as well as failing to act on Boko Harem happened on her watch. The phone rang at 0200, and she hit the snooze button...
 
eolesen said:
Learn to read the topic.. it's about Hillary's capability to be a leader.

The lapses which resulted in both Benghazi as well as failing to act on Boko Harem happened on her watch. The phone rang at 0200, and she hit the snooze button...
Click to expand...
Hind sight is 20/20.  Ask previous presidents.  
 
All the more reason to have all the facts out to pick the right person, as opposed to treating them like "American Idol" contestants.
 
True dat.  The right person would have avoided two wars were/are in.
 
Those as well but I think you missed some in the middle of those you posted?  Amnesia or selective memory?  
 
Do we have boots on the ground in Syria and Ukraine?  I h ave not seen any mention of US casualties.
 
No boots yet, but arguably, Putin wouldn't have been as emboldened to invade Crimea or Ukraine knowing we had a strong willed leader who might do more than say "Stop, or I'll say stop again!"

Likewise with Assad.

What happens when Russia decides to move beyond Ukraine and into Poland, Estonia, Latvia or Lithuania (all of whom are NATO members)?...
 
So they are not wars?  Just trying to figure out what the rules are.  How about we stick to facts and leave the predictions to Theresa Caputo?
 
I had mentioned hind sight and two wars.  You mentioned tow that Clinton started and then mentioned two other conflicts in which the US has no soldiers involved in yet failed to mention two other conflicts in which the casualties dwarf the ones you mentioned.  
 
Predictable on your part but curious none the less.
 
10245429_631382486954809_6797428188469781295_n.jpg
 
eolesen said:
No boots yet, but arguably, Putin wouldn't have been as emboldened to invade Crimea or Ukraine knowing we had a strong willed leader who might do more than say "Stop, or I'll say stop again!"

Likewise with Assad.

What happens when Russia decides to move beyond Ukraine and into Poland, Estonia, Latvia or Lithuania (all of whom are NATO members)?...
Click to expand...
 
Putin must have viewed George Bush as a weak leader in 2008 when he sent troops into Georgia.  What did GWB do about it?  A whole lot of nothing that's what.
 
People are kidding themselves if they think how strong or weak a US president is will stop a Russian leader from meddling in what they see as their backyard.
 
 
biden-finger-bw.jpg

 
At a closed-door fundraiser in Columbia, South Carolina Friday, Vice
President Joe Biden named the "later years of the Clinton administration" as the beginning of the economic disparities now facing the middle-class, in an apparent jab at possible 2016 presidential rival, Hillary Clinton.
Click to expand...
 
eolesen said:
The lapses which resulted in both Benghazi as well as failing to act on Boko Harem happened on her watch. The phone rang at 0200, and she hit the snooze button...
Click to expand...
 
And 9-11 along with the disaster that is called Iraq happened under GWB so what's your point?
 
777 fixer said:
 
And 9-11 along with the disaster that is called Iraq happened under GWB so what's your point?
Click to expand...
 
Bill Clinton opened the door to Iraq.  
biggrin.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top