What's new

This should improve Hillary's chances in 2016...

eolesen said:
I seem to remember a lot of conversation about Chris "never passed up a donut" Christy not too long ago.

Apparently, nobody can dislike a female or minority candidate/politician, unless they also happen to be a conservative. Then it is fair game.
Attacks/judgments on women are far different than those made on men.  Look at how Palin and Rice were talked about.  Look at how we talk about nearly any female in the public light.  How many times are a womans looks addressed when it has nothing to do with her job as opposed to a man?  Look at any TV news program.  Look at the females and then look at the males.  How many unattractive older females do you see as opposed to older/unattractive males?  Limbaugh compared Chelsa Clinton to a dog.  
 
Sparrows comment was pure sexist trash and you are defending it because others have done it.  This is the same hypocrisy you have accused other of.  Try looking in the mirror first.
 
Ms Tree said:
 
 
No because you are judging a woman on her looks and do not use the same judgement against men.  Show me a post of yours where you mention a males politicians caboose.   Talk about her politics all you want.  But please don't try and pass off the above as a political commentary.  It was sexist garbage and nothing else.  
 
Which happens all day, every day around the world. I don't do Political Correctness. Her disrespect and contempt for people who work for an host living is as wide as her ass.
 
But it's OK to say all manner of rotten remarks or how "Hot" Sarah Palin is. Nice Libtard double standard
 
Ms Tree said:
SO since everyone else does it it must be OK.  Have you told your ugly slut wife how you talk about other people?  Since when did common decency become PC?
 
See post 261, first line.
 
Yes, so it would seem. I recall Bristol Palin being called a slut. Not to mention the attacks on her mom. The Libtard double standard is as wide as Hillary's ass.
 
Oh and what was your answer to Walter Williams question? Perhaps I missed it in the other thread.
 
SparrowHawk said:
 
Yes, so it would seem. I recall Bristol Palin being called a slut. Not to mention the attacks on her mom. The Libtard double standard is as wide as Hillary's ass.
 
Oh and what was your answer to Walter Williams question? Perhaps I missed it in the other thread.
pretty sad that you base your values/morals on those of others.
 
Yes you did.
 
SparrowHawk said:
Yes, so it would seem. I recall Bristol Palin being called a slut. Not to mention the attacks on her mom. The Libtard double standard is as wide as Hillary's ass.
Oh, come on... Bristol wasn't called a slut because of her looks. It was for having sex out of wedlock, which went against what most people identified as being a Judeo-Christian values, and any deviation of such thus must be ridiculed at every opportunity...

And yet, it was labeled a crime against femininity when Sandra Fluke was called out as a slut for wanting to have as much sex out of wedlock as her body could handle.

Same act, different standards.
 
eolesen said:
Oh, come on... Bristol wasn't called a slut because of her looks. It was for having sex out of wedlock, which went against what most people identified as being a Judeo-Christian values, and any deviation of such thus must be ridiculed at every opportunity...

And yet, it was labeled a crime against femininity when Sandra Fluke was called out as a slut for wanting to have as much sex out of wedlock as her body could handle.

Same act, different standards.
You mean it had nothing to do with the hypocrisy of Ms S Palin talking about abstinence which neither her, Bristol or Trip could abide by but it was good enough for everyone else?
 
Not really what she said but I can see how it fits your POV.
 
You might want to check your facts, here, Tree. Why should "her", a married woman be abstinate? How isn't "Trip", a toddler, abstinate?...

If you had kids, maybe you'd understand, but they don't always follow what their parents teach them to do.

Regardless, dragging a politician's kids into the argument is one of those lines that aren't supposed to be crossed. The kids didn't run for office, or ask to be a public figure. If criticizing Chelsea is supposed to be off limits, then so should Bristol.

And, unless biology has changed suddenly, abstinence is still the only 100% scientifically proven and effective method of birth control.
 
Your a numbers guy.  You figure it out.
 
Sara and Todd eloped Aug 28, 1988
Track was born April 20, 1989
 
Avg gestation of a human child is ............ 38 weeks.  Here.  This might help you.
 
In this case they followed exactly what their parents did.
 
She dragged her kids into the political arena.  She put them on the stage.  She made abstinence an issue.  Chelsea was never used as a tool by her parents and therefore was off limits.  When you preach abstinence you would at least think the preacher would follow their own advice.  Shame on her.  
 
Bristol was 17 and pregnant.  Never got married.  Raising a doomed child as a single mother with no father figure.
 
Track was conceived out of wed lock.  Track and Britta got married in May of 2011.  Kayla Grace Palin was born on or before Aug 10, 2011.  Again, use the same site I linked above if you need some help with the calendar.  Track and Britta got divorced after 18 month of marriage but at least he lasted longer than his mom did as governor.  So now the kid is being raised by a single parent and we know how horrible that will be.  
 
So, to summarize.
 
 - Sara Palin pregnant out of wed lock.
 - Bristol 17, single and pregnant. Single mom (how horrible.  Kid will be scared for life)
 - Track.  Got his girlfriend pregnant out of wedlock, married her, divorced her 18 month later (like mother like son ... can't follow through with commitment) and raising a child as a single parent (another scared child).
 
But hey, everyone needs to practice abstinence right?  No biology has not changed but condoms work really really well.    Of course you do have to wear them (something the Palins obviously have not grasped or may not have been taught).  Perhaps sex ed might have done the entire family some good.
 
Feel free to grasp your own condoms, Tree. The world is better off for it.
 
So you are not even going to acknowledge 
 
So you are not even going to acknowledge that 
 
eolesen said:
You might want to check your facts, here, Tree. Why should "her", a married woman be abstinate? How isn't "Trip", a toddler, abstinate?...
 
 
Sara has an illegitimate child, Bristol has an illegitimate child and Track has an illegitimate child.  No hypocrisy there.  All you have is a lame insult.  Bravo.
 
You are the one who suggested I check my facts.  So I did.  Now you don't like the answer?  Not my problem.   May be you should check yours next time?  Just an idea.
 
Ms Tree said:
So you are not even going to acknowledge 
 
So you are not even going to acknowledge that 
 
 
Sara has an illegitimate child, Bristol has an illegitimate child and Track has an illegitimate child.  No hypocrisy there.  All you have is a lame insult.  Bravo.
 
What difference at this point does it make?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top