This should improve Hillary's chances in 2016...

[777 fixer]

You want to get touchy feely over the Iraq war, so be it......
 
 

 
So wondering why 4000+ US KIA is being touchy feely?

 

[southwind]

Of course you don't care who her husband is. That is why you have that bumper sticker.

You mean the first Black President?

 

[southwind]

 
No they're not.  Your issue is that she's a member of the wrong political party.   People, from both sides of the political spectrum, are willing to over look certain things about their preferred candidate.  Likewise they will focus in on perceived character flaws of candidate they don't like.

And then sometimes you've just got to vote for the lesser of 2 evils. Anybody vs. Hitlery, would be the lesser !

 

[Dog Wonder]

Last I checked, the idea of monarchies and bloodlines determining who the ruling class would be was dumped centuries ago.

Did you check before or after the Bush regime?

 

[eolesen]

Did you check before or after the Bush regime?

Before. I voted for Perot and Gore.

 

[delldude]

I could see getting sucked up in the moment with Perot who was only there to insure victory, but Gore?

 

[southwind]

But Gore invented the internet, is a Global Warming whore, and won a nobel prize (which absolutely means nothing, in today's world) for something!
 
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnFJ8cHAlco[youtube]

 

[Dog Wonder]

But Gore invented the internet, is a Global Warming whore, and won a nobel prize (which absolutely means nothing, in today's world) for something!

And you were the only one in your class not to get a trophy.

 

[Force Majeure]

But Gore...won a nobel prize (which absolutely means nothing, in today's world) for something!
 ]

That is incorrect. There is a substantial monetary component of the prize ($1.2M in 2012). He shared it with the IPCC IN 2007.

 

[delldude]

 
So wondering why 4000+ US KIA is being touchy feely?

 
What does it have to do with Benghazi?

 

[southwind]

That is incorrect. There is a substantial monetary component of the prize ($1.2M in 2012). He shared it with the IPCC IN 2007.

So he got paid to be IPCC's whore.............got it!

 

[eolesen]

What does it have to do with Benghazi?

Nothing, it's a WT-esque deflection.

Besides, the Dem's won't bring up Iraq -- Sen. Clinton voted for the war resolution, and stood behind her vote years later, even when it was politically convenient for others to change their mind. If I recall correctly, she was the one candidate in 2008 who never came out and said it was a mistake.

 

[777 fixer]

Nothing, it's a WT-esque deflection.

Besides, the Dem's won't bring up Iraq -- Sen. Clinton voted for the war resolution, and stood behind her vote years later, even when it was politically convenient for others to change their mind. If I recall correctly, she was the one candidate in 2008 who never came out and said it was a mistake.

 
It's not a deflection.  It's pointing out the hyporcrisy of people who will scream and yell about Benghazi and say there needs to be congressional investigation.  Yet when the subject of Iraq comes up they are either silent or say we just need to move on.  
 
So what has had more of a long term affect on this country, and the world for that matter, Iraq or Benghazi?  There's only one correct answer for that and we all know which one it is.

 

[delldude]

I think you are right....we need to get to the bottom of the hows and whys both Houses and quite a few of the worlds leaders all gave backing to Bush .
 

 
There's only one correct answer for that and we all know which one it is.

 
Yeah...the one where a conspiracy to lie, deny and subvert the truth all the way up the COC, to the American people while 4 men were killed asking for help from the government they gave their lives for.

 

[delldude]

Sit down Bear
 

 



Twitter page “Faith and Value Voters for Hillary Clinton 2016″ — the verified @Faith4Hillary account — was caught last week after having allegedly purchased 12,000 fake followers, roughly 42 percent of its total following.
The news was reported by Townhall Sunday and has also been verified by a number of websites that can determine the amount of fake, inactive and good followers of any social media user.
Clinton’s faith-based Twitter handle  obtained 42 percent of her followers through “inorganic, fraudulent or dishonest means,” according to Twitter Audit. StatusPeople calculated that a mere 18 percent of followers were healthy, genuine followers.
As of Friday, Clinton’s page stood at 42,000 followers, with an alleged 12,000 fakes.


- See more at: http://rare.us/story/hillary-clinton-caught-buying-twitter-followers/#sthash.bcVKEmup.dpuf