What's new

TWU...local 100

Joined
Aug 20, 2002
Messages
10,153
Reaction score
681
Arbitration resulted in TWU local 100(NY Subway) getting 3-4 % yearly raises over the term of the agreement.

While I'm glad for local 100, How come TWU can't get that for it's AA members ??


NH/BB's
 
Arbitration resulted in TWU local 100(NY Subway) getting 3-4 % yearly raises over the term of the agreement.

While I'm glad for local 100, How come TWU can't get that for it's AA members ??
NH/BB's

Because AA has Jim "Chicken" Little and they do not.
 
We got it but it works like this

The Transport Workers Union Air Transport Division will get a 3-4 percent reduction in yearly wages

Way to go twu
:up:
 
People, people!

The TWU and the company would love to give us something, BUT WE HAVE A CONTRACT!


Get ready boys when AMR announces bonus pay for the executives!
 
Because AA has Jim "Chicken" Little and they do not.


Actuallly Jim "Chicken" Little is now the International Executive President. He was appointed like most and will be there until death like the others.

You cannot be faulted for not knowing this, the appointments are quietly done for those that sellout the membership.

Gary Yingst is now your ATD Director. Never voted on him either, did you?
 
Gary Yingst is now your ATD Director. Never voted on him either, did you?


No. I am still waiting on my ballot. By the way, Local 100 got raises because Local 100 fights FOR the members and not AGAINST the members.

Don't worry. When burchette pulls his hands out of the company's pockets they will be filled! LOL!
 
Arbitration resulted in TWU local 100(NY Subway) getting 3-4 % yearly raises over the term of the agreement.

While I'm glad for local 100, How come TWU can't get that for it's AA members ??
NH/BB's

Simple. NYCTA has a virtual monopoly (it's not like they have to remain competitive with another subway), so the union winds up with a lot more bargaining power.
 
Why does Local 100 do better for their members than the 21 seperate locals who all operate under the same AA contracts do?

Simple, because Local 100 owns the contract, the members of Local 100 get to pick who controls their contract and who signs it into effect.

Its the same reason why the SWA Flight Attendants do better than AA TWU represented workers.

THEY OWN THE CONTRACT and they have electoral accountability over those who administer it.

At AA none of the 21 Locals at AA have authority over the contract, the International owns the contract. As owners of the contract they can do as they like and not be held accountable by the members that work under the contract.

At Local 100 the dues from the MTA go directly to Local 100. Local 100 then pays the International. At the 21 locals at AA the dues go to the International, then the International pays the locals. The AA Locals work for the International like stewards work for Local 100.

The leaders of Local 100 face an election every three years where the members who work under the deals these leaders negotiate get to hold them accountable, TWU members at AA NEVER get to hold the people responsible for the deals their union bosses put in place accountable. Whereas Local 100 members automatically get the rights of accountability every three years the only way AA members can do this is to find or form a new union, get 50%+1 to file cards calling for an election and have it approved by the NMB. To date that has not happened.

So at Local 100 the people who control the contract work for the members at the members discretion but at AA the people who control the contract do not work for the members, in fact even the people that the members elect to run their powerless locals dont work for them, they work for the International because thats who writes the checks for the locals.

Local 100 has 35000 members, all in one local, the AA system has less than that yet are spread out into 21 locals with no say over the contracts, thats why Local 100 does better for their members.

PS, if we had been getting COLA raises all along, which is the big concession that Boeing workers agreed to, we would be earning around $40/hr by now.

PSS Rojer Toussaint has been reelected by the members of Local 100, much to the dissapointment of the TWU International.
 
Interesting, Bob. Controlling the money is obviously the key difference.

Dumb question, perhaps, but aside from appointed leaders being in favor of divide/conquer, what stops the ATD locals from consolidating into a single local per company, controlling dues flow, and taking ownership of the contracts?
 
It also helps if the employer (MTA and Bloomberg) is a pussy who won't throw people in jail for breaking the law and causing billions of dollars in economic damages.

I have more respect for pond scum than I do NYC MTA employees, and I mean that from two perspectives: 1) they flagrantly break state law and get away with it, and 2) they are rude to their customers and get away with it.

I wish AA employees a better future, and please use something other than Satan with which to compare yourselves. You don't deserve that.
 
It also helps if the employer (MTA and Bloomberg) is a pussy who won't throw people in jail for breaking the law and causing billions of dollars in economic damages.

I have more respect for pond scum than I do NYC MTA employees, and I mean that from two perspectives: 1) they flagrantly break state law and get away with it, and 2) they are rude to their customers and get away with it.

I wish AA employees a better future, and please use something other than Satan with which to compare yourselves. You don't deserve that.
Correct me if i'm wrong but didn't the leadership of Local 100 get sent to jail when they went out on strike, which led to this contract? IIRC they also went to jail in 1965/66 for striking, as well as the head of the teacher union in 1968. But I do believe that Wagner was Mayor then and he didn't take any crap from anyone.
 
I have more respect for pond scum than I do NYC MTA employees, and I mean that from two perspectives: 1) they flagrantly break state law and get away with it, and 2) they are rude to their customers and get away with it.

Sounds like the law needs to be changed. :up:

BTW..the leaders did do some time for the strike. :shock:

I guess you prefer to have them back down and take whatever they offer because of a law. That type of mentality makes up the other half of the twu. :down:
 
It also helps if the employer (MTA and Bloomberg) is a pussy who won't throw people in jail for breaking the law and causing billions of dollars in economic damages.

So in the long run the Mayor and the MTA should have agreed to the demands of local 100

Thus saving billions of dollars in economic damage.

But today the corporate mentality is to break the unions no matter what the cost or the impact to society.

That is why we strike.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top