CIO: I read the paper this morning, that is why I asked for opinions.
You did not give an opinion on this program. Are you going to do so?
I have been to the one day class, where we built Leggo helicopters to show that by planning we can build more helicopters, more efficiently and with less labor. When I pointed this out one of the engineers in the class cussed me and left.
(No I did not call Human Resources to have the man fired)
I believe that Contiguous Improvement needs to implemented within the TWU itself. Something must change. The continuous concessionary contracts must be halted.
It is possible that Continuous Improvement could work in a manufacturing environment, with the exception of its anti-labor stance.
The manager mentioned in the article from Hangar 6B visited our class and explained how they had moved the chemical cabinets back to the docks. Over the last two years, the company has accomplished just he opposite. Now they are reversing course. If the positioning of the chemical cabinets back to the aircraft dock is critical to CI, then why has Business Unit 3&4 not implemented this?
FACT: I have not read the book myself, but it has been said by those who have read the book, that "Continuous Improvement" schemes come right out of the book "Confessions of a Union Buster".
I have read the book and CI in its base principles is prominent in the techniques used by the individuals and groups whose profession is to bust unions or the attempt to organize those unions.
RUMOR: AA is going to ground 10 A-300's within the next 4 months. This will place the fleet size below 25. What will happen to the work force and the outsource percentages then?
If the fleet or any fleet covered under the Scope language of the AA/TWU agreement falls below 26 aircraft does this also mean that we lose the maintenance of this fleet type?
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.
P.O. Box 619616
DFW Airport, Texas 75261 -9616
May 5, 1989
Mr. John J. Kerrigan
International Vice President
Director-Air Transport Division
Transport Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO
80 West End Avenue
New York, New York 10023
Re: Cross Service Agreement Dated May 27, 1974
Dear Mr. Kerrigan:
This will confirm our discussion regarding the Letter of Agreement dated May 27, 1974 pertaining to the Cross Service Agreement. Since this letter was written, deregulation and American’s growth have brought about a change in the way we accomplish our work and we have demonstrated an enviable record of stable and secure employment. Because of recent acquisition of some small aircraft fleets and expansion to additional cities, it is in the best interest of American Airlines and the Transport Workers Union to respond to changes in our industry, It is the intention of American Airlines to change its fleet configuration as market conditions and aircraft availability dictate. It is not economically feasible for American Airlines to purchase tooling and or construct facilities for those small fleets which are planned to be phased out in the near term.
We have agreed, therefore, that during the term of this agreement (amendable March 1, 1993) those existing fleets of 25 aircraft or less and any new cities where we contract out our line maintenance will be exempt for reporting purposes from the Cross Service Agreement*. Our future quarterly report will reflect this change.
Very truly yours,
Charles A. Pasciuto
Vice President
Employee Relations
Agreed to this date:
Edward R. Koziatek
* (For example, the B-747 aircraft which is planned to be replaced by the MD-11 and the B-737/BAe-146 which are planned for near term replacement. The B-727 fleet will not be segregated by fleet type.)