Ben Carson hops on the crazy train again.

No, you didn't "own it", Garfy. You fell for it, and still have to couch it with "it sounds like something he'd say" which is total BS but something we've all come to know from you.

Post of Clinton photoshopped? No idea what you're referring to there.
 
Black Magic said:
Only in your libtard emotional logic. No president with such a dreadful 1st term got a second chance...black privilage is strong and america loves an underdog.
 
Libtard logic.  Maybe so.  But I recall in the last election, the republican candidate was going to address the debt by cutting taxes...and he was going to increase the military.  Using conservatard logic, 3 minus 2 must really equal 5.  How does one cut taxes, increase spending and reduce debt?  FWIW....pretty much every single republican candidate proposes the same thing.  Well..save for Trump.  He actually proposed a tax hike on the "job creators".   I'm just wondering that in the off chance, one of the republicans happens to win in 2016...will you all still be opposed to rising debt? 
 
eolesen said:
No, you didn't "own it", Garfy. You fell for it, and still have to couch it with "it sounds like something he'd say" which is total BS but something we've all come to know from you.Post of Clinton photoshopped? No idea what you're referring to there.
You remember it. The photoshop job of Hillary Clinton with the confederate in the background.

I saw it before the mods removed it. And it was not posted as a joke. You fell for it.
 
KCFlyer said:
Libtard logic.  Maybe so.  But I recall in the last election, the republican candidate was going to address the debt by cutting taxes...and he was going to increase the military.  Using conservatard logic, 3 minus 2 must really equal 5.  How does one cut taxes, increase spending and reduce debt?  FWIW....pretty much every single republican candidate proposes the same thing.  Well..save for Trump.  He actually proposed a tax hike on the "job creators".   I'm just wondering that in the off chance, one of the republicans happens to win in 2016...will you all still be opposed to rising debt?
Most people know , believe it or not, lowering taxes, increases federal revenue!

"The next time you find yourself engaged in this debate and someone tells you that you that taxes must be raised to pay down the debt, you can refer them to this article.

"http://www.forbes.com/sites/mikepatton/2012/10/15/do-tax-cuts-increase-government-revenue/

I know, I know.....so just how are the socialist libtards suppose to stick it to the Evil Rich, if they can't raise their taxes!
 
Glenn Quagmire said:
You remember it. The photoshop job of Hillary Clinton with the confederate in the background.
I saw it before the mods removed it. And it was not posted as a joke. You fell for it.
That's desecration to the Conferdaerate flag!
 
southwind said:
Most people know , believe it or not, lowering taxes, increases federal revenue!

"The next time you find yourself engaged in this debate and someone tells you that you that taxes must be raised to pay down the debt, you can refer them to this article.

"http://www.forbes.com/sites/mikepatton/2012/10/15/do-tax-cuts-increase-government-revenue/

I know, I know.....so just how are the socialist libtards suppose to stick it to the Evil Rich, if they can't raise their taxes!
Okay...let's say you are correct on that.  NOW....how does cutting taxes AND increasing defense spending lower the debt?  I seem to recall that it didn't work under Reagan (he cut taxes once and raised them 7 times), it didn't work under GHWB (he had to break his no new taxes pledge to address the debt).  It didn't work under W....who not only went into one (justified) war with no means to pay for it...he started a second (unjustified war)....and cut taxes again.  IT got to the point where Cheney said that "Reagan proved that deficits don't matter" (unless a democrat is in office).  So....how does cutting taxes and increasing defense spending (as well as getting into another war) - which is what pretty much every GOP candidate proposes - going to cut the debt.  3 - 2 = 5. 
 
12074707_905922969478560_5619418669842479603_n.png
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #42
eolesen said:
No, you didn't "own it", Garfy. You fell for it, and still have to couch it with "it sounds like something he'd say" which is total BS but something we've all come to know from you.

Post of Clinton photoshopped? No idea what you're referring to there.
Yep. I owned it. Said so in post 11. Someone who claims evolutiln and the big bang are fairy takes and someone who thins if the jews had huns could have averted the holocaust could very we have said people could have out run a volcano.

No, of course you dont.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #43
Glenn Quagmire said:
You remember it. The photoshop job of Hillary Clinton with the confederate in the background.
I saw it before the mods removed it. And it was not posted as a joke. You fell for it.
That would be the one. Eolsen does not have the courage to admit he screwed up twice.

If you s rew up, own it. No big deal. Its whwn you lie about it that it really gets sad.
 
KCFlyer said:
Okay...let's say you are correct on that.  NOW....how does cutting taxes AND increasing defense spending lower the debt?  I seem to recall that it didn't work under Reagan (he cut taxes once and raised them 7 times), it didn't work under GHWB (he had to break his no new taxes pledge to address the debt).  It didn't work under W....who not only went into one (justified) war with no means to pay for it...he started a second (unjustified war)....and cut taxes again.  IT got to the point where Cheney said that "Reagan proved that deficits don't matter" (unless a democrat is in office).  So....how does cutting taxes and increasing defense spending (as well as getting into another war) - which is what pretty much every GOP candidate proposes - going to cut the debt.  3 - 2 = 5.
How does cutting taxes, raising federal revenue, and spending more on social programs, I.e BaRack-O-Care, Planned Parenthood, etc. solved the deficit?
 
Back
Top