BoeingBoy
Veteran
- Nov 9, 2003
- 16,512
- 5,865
Not necessarily, but usually is meant to further an agenda. That's because it's usually one side that's responsible for the majority of leaks, and that side has an agenda to push. So you mostly get the "this idea is great" without the "But what about...". Just look at this subject - the leaks all make it sound like a potentially good deal while those publicly arguing the other side are identified by name. If those named sources have an agenda, it should be relatively obvious from who they are or who they represent. No so with un-named sources.Leaked information CAN but not necessarily is meant to push an agenda...
Jim