Mergers? What Are They Good For?

jimntx

Veteran
Jun 28, 2003
11,161
3,285
Dallas, TX
www.usaviation.com
This article is in today's NY Times magazine. To access the full article, you have to register, but it is free.

Some quotes from the article...

"Academic research suggests that few mergers add up to significantly more prosperous or successful companies and also that acquisitions during buyout booms, like the one we are in now, are more likely to fail than those made in other periods. And when one company acquires another using its own stock as currency, as commonly happens today, shareholders' stakes in the acquiring firm typically decline.

What's worse, there is a disturbing trend among some of the most aggressive corporate acquirers to use deals to mask deteriorating financial results at their companies and to reap outsize executive pay."

"Perhaps the biggest downside to mergers, however, is their human toll. Deals that combine companies are becoming a bigger factor behind large-scale layoffs across the nation."

"It's probably no coincidence that some of the biggest frauds in recent years have involved serial deal makers like Tyco International, Waste Management and WorldCom."

The complete article
 
I guess I am anti consilidation. It hurts worker and consumers. Efficiancy is the bane of workers ( lower wages and less jobs ) and less competition is the bane of consumers ( less competition, higher prices )
 
Back
Top