What's new

533,000 jobs cut in November

Perhaps I missed it but what do unions have to do with a tanked economy?
 
Perhaps I missed it but what do unions have to do with a tanked economy?



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Your correct Cosworth,........Unions have ZERO to do with a tanking economy.

BUT,

8 years of unregulated CAPITALISM at ANY COST, has EVERYTHING to do with it !!!

W is making Jimmy Carter, and Herbert Hoover look like Genius's :shock: :shock:
 
Yes.............We all know bad, "EVIL MANAGEMENT" and "BIG GOVERNMENT" help land the U.S. auto makers where they are and the "UAW W/ UN-REALISTIC DEMANDS" has nothing to do with their demise.............................Gimme a break ! :down:
 
Yes.............We all know bad, "EVIL MANAGEMENT" and "BIG GOVERNMENT" help land the U.S. auto makers where they are and the "UAW W/ UN-REALISTIC DEMANDS" has nothing to do with their demise.............................Gimme a break ! :down:
Why did management agree to what the UAW asked for?

If their "demands" were unrealistic, and they were granted by management, where does the blame lie?
 
Why did management agree to what the UAW asked for?

If their "demands" were unrealistic, and they were granted by management, where does the blame lie?

Can you say "JOB BANK" ? What freakin' joke ! :down:

Sometimes a company is "FORCED" to give into certain "ASSININE" demands in order to complete the work!

Another reason why jobs are being lost ! :shock:
 
Can you say "JOB BANK" ? What freakin' joke ! :down:

Sometimes a company is "FORCED" to give into certain "ASSININE" demands in order to complete the work!

Another reason why jobs are being lost ! :shock:

And if the EFCA passes then it will be even worse with mass exodus of jobs leaving the united states. This was tried during the great depression (union friendly legislation) and it only exacerbated the unemployment problem.
 
Companys are in business to make money for the "SHAREHOLDERS"!

They are not in business to provide jobs! :shock:

Anyone disagree with this statement ? :blink:
 
Companys are in business to make money for the "SHAREHOLDERS"!

They are not in business to provide jobs! :shock:

Anyone disagree with this statement ? :blink:




Did you forget "TOP SHELF EXECUTIVES"?
 
Companys are in business to make money for the "SHAREHOLDERS"!

They are not in business to provide jobs! :shock:

Anyone disagree with this statement ? :blink:



Southwind,

NO,...I agree with your question's above.

NOW, to the asinine Answer you gave to "tech", when he asked you why The big 3 agreed to UAW $$$ demands(that they sometimes MUST give in) to that I say.....BULL SHITE !!!!

Example(s),

If say FORD can make money, after AGREEING to a UAW pay Hike, than How can the UAW.."NOW" be held responsible, for that action ??

"IF" you reply, that FORD stopped "making money" 1 1/2 years AFTER they agreed to the UAW request, ..THEN....FORD(friggin') MANAGEMENT should have insisted on an 18 month contract.
WOULD"NT you AGREE ???????????????????

Every union contract in existance today, contains a clause that SPECIFICALLY States..."that Management ULTIMATELY has the RIGHT to MANAGE it's Business"(In other words,..THEY have the FINAL SAY) !!!!

Now if Ford, (in our hypothetical exercise)............M I S ......M A N A G E S ...their business, WELL ..Shame on THEM !!!...NOT the UAW.

You know what Southwind,

YOU actually(from time to time) are a HELP to me !!!

YOU(from time to time), Keep reminding me..In NO UNCERTAIN TERMS, why your descendants/neighbors................were DEFEATED in the .."Unpleasantries", back around..the 1860's !!!! :shock: :shock: :shock:


The old saying(s) that ..."the apple(s) don't fall too far from the tree(s)...DEFINETLY apply in YOUR case !!!!!!!!!!!
 
Companys are in business to make money for the "SHAREHOLDERS"!

They are not in business to provide jobs! :shock:

Anyone disagree with this statement ? :blink:
Yeah, companies would be perfect it weren't for those pesky employees.

They want pay and everything...🙄

I'll bet your glad you don't work for a company with that attitude. You do have a job, don't you?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top