WorldTraveler
Corn Field
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2003
- Messages
- 21,709
- Reaction score
- 10,662
Interesting dialogue here and it highlights that the strategic implications of AA's filing are way larger than what AA people want to believe - and that they and their company have little control over their outcome.
The right of exclusivity for a plan - while long and can be extended - will end and will end before AA emerges. just as if AA is out of BK, corporate laws require that a publicly traded company be open to outside offers - and the creditors will absolutely be keen to ensure that those offers are heard. The longer AA remains in BK w/o hearing offers only means they will be more "cleaned up" by the time they entertain offers which will increase their value to creditors. Everyone is best served including the creditors by allowing the BK process to work as much as possible to get AA's costs back in line.
The best offer will prevail -and in corporate finance it has as much to do so with long term prospects as it does in putting cash on the table now. Like AA, an offer from US that could top DL or even oneworld partners would have to be largely with borrowed money - which diminishes the long term value of the deal.
Whether DL wants to take on AA or not will remain to be seen but what is abundantly clear is that DL has the strategic guts, the financial strength, a strong track record of merger/acquisition success, and a stable company right now to do what it needs to do.
.
AA's aircraft orders are not going to be an influence in any merger/acquisition talks or in keeping AA as a standalone carrier. AA needs to replace as many as 500 aircraft over the next ten years... right now they have committed financing for a fraction of that amount. Any major acquriring/merging airline operates or has experience in operating multiple fleet types including mixed Airbus/Boeing fleets. DL still has committed to a small fraction of what it will need for fleet replacement over the next ten years... it could easily win the creditors over by taking the AA A/B orders at the 460 aircraft intended. US still has plenty of aircraft it could retire even if its plan didn't involve reducing any network duplication.
.
The problem with AA/US remains that the combined carrier would put together the two weakest large carriers in the US industry now and would leave AA/US with a #1 or #2 position in very few segments of the market... looking at market stats today for the industry is rather meaningless when you consider that AA will shrink as it moves through BK and that other carriers - DL, UA, and WN included - will continue to grow in the 3-4 years before AA and US could even merge their operations and begin to act like one airline. Even in a best case scenario, AA/US has minimal position in Asia and a far smaller position in continental Europe than either DL or UA - either separately or with their partners.
Add in the fact that the competitive attacks on AA continue even today - and there could be 18 months or more left in BK - and AA's ability to "pick up where it left off" competitively is highly doubtful.
.
Like it or not, but AA's future likely will not be decided by itself but by those in the industry that have much more financial strength and larger strategic objectives than either AA or US can overcome.
The right of exclusivity for a plan - while long and can be extended - will end and will end before AA emerges. just as if AA is out of BK, corporate laws require that a publicly traded company be open to outside offers - and the creditors will absolutely be keen to ensure that those offers are heard. The longer AA remains in BK w/o hearing offers only means they will be more "cleaned up" by the time they entertain offers which will increase their value to creditors. Everyone is best served including the creditors by allowing the BK process to work as much as possible to get AA's costs back in line.
The best offer will prevail -and in corporate finance it has as much to do so with long term prospects as it does in putting cash on the table now. Like AA, an offer from US that could top DL or even oneworld partners would have to be largely with borrowed money - which diminishes the long term value of the deal.
Whether DL wants to take on AA or not will remain to be seen but what is abundantly clear is that DL has the strategic guts, the financial strength, a strong track record of merger/acquisition success, and a stable company right now to do what it needs to do.
.
AA's aircraft orders are not going to be an influence in any merger/acquisition talks or in keeping AA as a standalone carrier. AA needs to replace as many as 500 aircraft over the next ten years... right now they have committed financing for a fraction of that amount. Any major acquriring/merging airline operates or has experience in operating multiple fleet types including mixed Airbus/Boeing fleets. DL still has committed to a small fraction of what it will need for fleet replacement over the next ten years... it could easily win the creditors over by taking the AA A/B orders at the 460 aircraft intended. US still has plenty of aircraft it could retire even if its plan didn't involve reducing any network duplication.
.
The problem with AA/US remains that the combined carrier would put together the two weakest large carriers in the US industry now and would leave AA/US with a #1 or #2 position in very few segments of the market... looking at market stats today for the industry is rather meaningless when you consider that AA will shrink as it moves through BK and that other carriers - DL, UA, and WN included - will continue to grow in the 3-4 years before AA and US could even merge their operations and begin to act like one airline. Even in a best case scenario, AA/US has minimal position in Asia and a far smaller position in continental Europe than either DL or UA - either separately or with their partners.
Add in the fact that the competitive attacks on AA continue even today - and there could be 18 months or more left in BK - and AA's ability to "pick up where it left off" competitively is highly doubtful.
.
Like it or not, but AA's future likely will not be decided by itself but by those in the industry that have much more financial strength and larger strategic objectives than either AA or US can overcome.