WorldTraveler
Corn Field
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2003
- Messages
- 21,709
- Reaction score
- 10,662
that~s what I remembered... the issue is whether the 773ER can be operated at the MTOW for the 773ER or the lower MTOW of the 772ER which is about the same as the 773 (non ER)... if the intention is to use the 773ER to primarily add more capacity to LHR and GRU, then you don't need the higher capabilities of the 773ER ... the 773 would work fine... NRT is a bit more dicey esp. from DFW....Actaully they do have 777-300 rates in th book, its around $4/hr more than a -200
.
the benefit of the 773ER is it is the most efficient longhaul airplane available so AA can increase its productivity substantially by using that aircraft.... when combined with the 738 vs M80 replacements, AA can make a decent sized dent in productivity compared to their present fleet.... but it comes at the price of a lot more debt... even though AA wouldn't be buying them for a dime more than the market value of the aircraft, it is more debt. AA is shifting costs from the operational side to the finance side by buying new aircraft.
.
if AA is able to get labor sign-off, the 773ER can indeed by used to substantially increase AA's ability to compete in long-haul markets.. but the reality is that the 772ER could do many of the same routes.. the increased range on the 773ER is not near as great of a benefit as the reduced operating costs...