Sorry to be dense, but if you agree that NW would have gone for the injunction anyways, what practical difference would it have made in the grand scheme of things?I think had they put an intelligent work for the membership team in office(PFAA), They would have been putting the heat to NWA management a week ago plus. Of course NWA would have gone for an injunction, A union working for its membership wouldnt have waited 10 days after to put the heat on.
I do agree that as a tactical decision to rally the troops and keep momentum going, AFA shouldn't have delayed things this long. They should have started the CHAOS countdown the day the concessionary contract was imposed. However, that would have little practical difference in how things ultimately evolved. And I suspect part of AFA's strategy of delay has to do with the fact that perhaps they know there is not a lot of support among NW members for CHAOS or striking, given that TA2 was only narrowly defeated -- but I don't have access to that type of info, and I suspect you don't either.
Come on Bear, you should know better than that.
You are now dealing with a therotical impossibility on hindsight technology. After the delays and extended timelines, what other conclusion would a reasonable person come up with?
UT
?