MCI transplant
Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2003
- Messages
- 5,311
- Reaction score
- 584
Basically what she's saying if you through enough money at it, it might go away!!! Isn't that the Democrat's answer to all our problem's! ------- And how is that working?
Huh? I don't how you got that out of her interview. What I heard is that if the economics of the countries improve there will be a little less of a draw to the terrorist organizations. Even if she or someone else did say that, I suspect it would be significantly less expensive to do that than to wage war. We wasted $1,000,000,000,000.00 in the two wars. How did that work out for us? How much more do you want to waste to achieve your desired out come?MCI transplant said:Basically what she's saying if you through enough money at it, it might go away!!! Isn't that the Democrat's answer to all our problem's! ------- And how is that working?
It is working great. They have an army of dependents that vote for them no matter what every election cycle.MCI transplant said:Basically what she's saying if you through enough money at it, it might go away!!! Isn't that the Democrat's answer to all our problem's! ------- And how is that working?
How do you defend the $1,000,000,000,000 thrown at Iraq and Afghanistan? Was it well spent?La Li Lu Le Lo said:It is working great. They have an army of dependents that vote for them no matter what every election cycle.
They are going to buy those votes no matter how much it cost YOU. There is always another "entitlement" to add.
All the world's problems can be solved by throwing other people's money at them......... right?
Ask Obama. A good portion of that was on his watch.Ms Tree said:How do you defend the $1,000,000,000,000 thrown at Iraq and Afghanistan? Was it well spent?
Do you have ADD? Concentrate.Ms Tree said:First of all that has nothing to do with anything. The issue was the cost of the war and whether it was spent wisely. Second, a war is not like a light switch. You cannot just come into office after 8 years of war and turn it off like nothing happened. That would more more irresponsible than getting us in to the war in the first place. Thirdly, what is one to say to the vets who died and were injured? Sorry, we are not paying for the war any more, you will not be getting any more benefits related to the war?
Aside from all that you are still wrong. Reality and you just don't get along very well. This 2011 study claims that as of 2011 (Obama had only been in office 2 plus years) the two wars had already cost $1.6 trillion. They claim that total could rise to close to $6 trillion over the next 40 years due to obligations.http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/14/us-iraq-war-anniversary-idUSBRE92D0PG20130314
We have been paying for the war long before Obama took office, and we will be paying for it long long after he has left.
Ms Tree said:First of all that has nothing to do with anything. The issue was the cost of the war and whether it was spent wisely. Second, a war is not like a light switch. You cannot just come into office after 8 years of war and turn it off like nothing happened. That would more more irresponsible than getting us in to the war in the first place. Thirdly, what is one to say to the vets who died and were injured? Sorry, we are not paying for the war any more, you will not be getting any more benefits related to the war?
Aside from all that you are still wrong. Reality and you just don't get along very well. This 2011 study claims that as of 2011 (Obama had only been in office 2 plus years) the two wars had already cost $1.6 trillion. They claim that total could rise to close to $6 trillion over the next 40 years due to obligations.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/14/us-iraq-war-anniversary-idUSBRE92D0PG20130314
We have been paying for the war long before Obama took office, and we will be paying for it long long after he has left.
`
So he posted it. Who cares. Fact...
Still Wrong.
The great Mys Tery twist. When you lose a battle throw an off topic to prove some stupid point that has nothing to do with your discussion. Brilliant!...if your audience is dumber than yourself it might work!How do you defend the $1,000,000,000,000 thrown at Iraq and Afghanistan? Was it well spent?
The issue is about some silver spoon-fed Muslim educated by the Western society that decided to kill those he lived among in prosperity. The fact is Obama has run up the tab on the war by pulling out early. This war will soon double what the Bushs's overall Gulf War cost.First of all that has nothing to do with anything. The issue was the cost of the war and whether it was spent wisely. Second, a war is not like a light switch. You cannot just come into office after 8 years of war and turn it off like nothing happened. That would more more irresponsible than getting us in to the war in the first place. Thirdly, what is one to say to the vets who died and were injured? Sorry, we are not paying for the war any more, you will not be getting any more benefits related to the war?
Aside from all that you are still wrong. Reality and you just don't get along very well. This 2011 study claims that as of 2011 (Obama had only been in office 2 plus years) the two wars had already cost $1.6 trillion. They claim that total could rise to close to $6 trillion over the next 40 years due to obligations.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/14/us-iraq-war-anniversary-idUSBRE92D0PG20130314
We have been paying for the war long before Obama took office, and we will be paying for it long long after he has left.
Ms Tree said:How do you defend the $1,000,000,000,000 thrown at Iraq and Afghanistan? Was it well spent?
La Li Lu Le Lo said:Ask Obama. A good portion of that was on his watch.
LoL.Ms Tree said:First of all that has nothing to do with anything. The issue was the cost of the war and whether it was spent wisely. Second, a war is not like a light switch. You cannot just come into office after 8 years of war and turn it off like nothing happened. That would more more irresponsible than getting us in to the war in the first place. Thirdly, what is one to say to the vets who died and were injured? Sorry, we are not paying for the war any more, you will not be getting any more benefits related to the war?
Aside from all that you are still wrong. Reality and you just don't get along very well. This 2011 study claims that as of 2011 (Obama had only been in office 2 plus years) the two wars had already cost $1.6 trillion. They claim that total could rise to close to $6 trillion over the next 40 years due to obligations.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/14/us-iraq-war-anniversary-idUSBRE92D0PG20130314
We have been paying for the war long before Obama took office, and we will be paying for it long long after he has left.
Again, no lie is too big for Ms Tree.signals said:Your accuracy is proven to be based on your twisted lies. Continue to spread your ignorance which would be entertaining if not mixed with your DENIAL, or your defense mechanism of choice.
A classic DSM by the book symptom that you have mastered. Too laughable to us whose intelligent you try to insult!